Pneumatic Spool Valve Driving Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing portable driving devices for stakes, survey flags, or posts are inefficient in delivering consistent and controlled impact for driving objects of varying sizes and shapes into the ground, lacking a reliable mechanism for secure engagement and safe operation.

Innovation Solution

A portable reciprocating driving device with a valve control assembly and pressurized fluid system, utilizing a spool valve controlled by a rod and a handle assembly with safety switches, which creates a reciprocating motion between inner and outer sleeves to drive objects into the ground, ensuring secure engagement and safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a portable driving device uses a simple impact mechanism, then the device structure is simple, but it cannot deliver consistent and controlled impact for driving objects of varying sizes and shapes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidconsistent and controlled impact
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a reciprocating motion mechanism where the inner sleeve moves back and forth within the outer sleeve, driven by pressurized fluid. This dynamic system allows controlled delivery of impact force to objects of varying sizes and shapes, resolving the contradiction between simple structure and reliable controlled impact.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses pressurized fluid (pneumatic system) to power the reciprocating motion of the inner sleeve. The fluid pressure control assembly regulates the pressurized fluid delivery, enabling consistent and controlled impact forces while maintaining a relatively simple portable device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

2Reliability

If the device uses a secure engagement mechanism for the post, then the driving effectiveness is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecure engagementVSAvoidengagement mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The inner sleeve is nested within the outer sleeve, creating a compact engagement mechanism. The inner sleeve receives the post and is secured within the outer sleeve through the reciprocating motion and fluid pressure system, achieving secure engagement without excessive structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Reliability

If safety switches are added to control pressurized fluid delivery, then operational safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidcontrol system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety switches are integrated into the handle assembly, allowing the operator to control pressurized fluid delivery through simple manual activation. The system provides self-control where the operator's action directly regulates the fluid pressure delivery to the reciprocating mechanism, improving safety without significantly increasing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of manufacture

If the valve box is designed to be self-cleaning, then maintenance requirements are reduced, but the valve control mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance requirementsVSAvoidvalve control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valve box is designed with self-cleaning capability where pressurized fluid flows through the valve mechanism, automatically clearing debris and preventing buildup. The fluid pressure system that powers the reciprocating motion also serves to clean the valve box, reducing maintenance requirements without requiring a separate complex cleaning mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device effectively drives objects of various cross-sectional shapes into the ground with controlled impact, providing safety and efficiency through the use of a self-cleaning valve box and modular design, reducing weight and air consumption compared to prior art.

Implementation Method 1

a spool valve mechanism, and extends through the spool valve (which is disposed in the VB), which alternately directs pressurized fluid, from an external source into opposite sides of the FPCP

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressurized fluid: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

The spring is engaged to the spool valve and biases the spool valve in a first position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

The reciprocating motion of the ORS relative to the IRS wherein the top closed end of the IRS receives repetitive reciprocating impact blows from the inner closed end of the ORS thereby driving the post into the earth

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectImpact force: Impact Force

Data Source

PatentUS9157253B2Portable driving device
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 MAXX MFG INC
  • US9157253B2 patent drawing
  • US9157253B2 patent drawing
  • US9157253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable driving device for permanently driving stakes, survey flags, posts, or the like, of varying sizes and shapes, into the ground. The invention provides for powering the device by a pressurized fluid with a single power cylinder, a valve control assembly including a self-exhausting spool valve controlled by a rod that runs through the spool valve, and safety switches in series for controlling delivery of pressurized fluid to the driving device.