Pod-Deformed Structural Panel for Strength Without Added Weight

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing structural elements struggle to increase strength without adding material, while maintaining mechanical stiffness and versatility, and are often complex and costly to manufacture and recycle.

Innovation Solution

A structural element made from sheet material deformed to form pods that protrude from the plane, with sloping walls that act as interconnecting diagonal braces, creating a double depth space-frame lattice type matrix.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the thickness of the panel is increased to improve strength and rigidity, then the mechanical properties are improved, but the weight and material costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel strengthVSAvoidpanel weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms a 2D flat sheet into a 3D structure by forming pods that protrude from the sheet plane. This dimensional change creates volume and structural depth without proportionally increasing material usage, thereby improving strength and rigidity while controlling weight. The pods add structural dimensionality that resists lateral point stresses and distributed loads more effectively than flat sheets of equivalent material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel is segmented into multiple functional zones: flat sheet regions provide baseline strength, while pod regions provide enhanced structural support. The pods are distributed at intervals rather than continuously, creating a segmented structure that optimizes material placement. This segmentation allows the panel to achieve high strength where needed while maintaining lower weight in less critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If complex structural shapes like corrugations or composite structures are used to increase strength, then the mechanical properties improve, but the manufacturing complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel strengthVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple structural functions into a single pod feature. The pods simultaneously provide: (1) increased moment of inertia for bending resistance, (2) load distribution surfaces, (3) structural depth, and (4) potential attachment points. This consolidation of functions into unified pod structures reduces manufacturing complexity compared to assembling multiple separate structural components or using multi-layer composites.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The pod geometry parameters (diameter, height, wall thickness, spacing) can be varied to optimize performance for different loading conditions. By changing these parameters, the same basic pod structure can adapt to various strength requirements without requiring fundamentally different structural designs, thereby managing complexity while maintaining versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If more material is used to increase panel strength and rigidity, then the mechanical properties improve, but the material costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel strengthVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent achieves increased strength without proportional material increase by utilizing the third dimension. The pods protrude from the sheet plane, creating volume that resists bending and lateral loads. This volumetric structure provides mechanical advantage through increased section modulus and moment of inertia, delivering higher strength per unit of material compared to flat sheet configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The panel functions as a composite structure combining flat sheet material with three-dimensional pod structures. This composite approach leverages the strengths of both 2D and 3D geometries: the flat sheets provide continuous surface coverage and baseline strength, while the pods provide enhanced structural support and load distribution. The composite nature allows optimized material usage across different functional zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The structural element achieves high resilience to external forces, maintains mechanical stiffness, and is cost-effective to manufacture, while allowing for versatile use without preferred orientation.

Implementation Method 1

sheet material that is deformed at intervals along its length and width to provide pods that protrude from the plane of the sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12312124B2Structural element
Publication Date: 2025.05.27 GRIDESIC HLDG LTD
  • US12312124B2 patent drawing
  • US12312124B2 patent drawing
  • US12312124B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structural element (10) for forming a panel, with an upper plane (12) and lower plane (14) which are parallel and deformed along their plane at intervals by pods (16) which extrude toward the opposing plane with their internal faces mating to one another.