PoE Lighting Node Control During Controller Outages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional Power over Ethernet (PoE) lighting systems face safety issues when controllers go offline, as lights may deactivate or fail to turn on, potentially leaving occupants without necessary illumination.

Innovation Solution

A node with a microprocessor is designed to control powered devices, such as lights or alarms, based on data received from a controller, and can operate independently if communication with the controller is interrupted, ensuring continued functionality even if the controller goes offline by setting a predetermined dim level or executing a script.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the system uses centralized controller management for PoE devices, then control precision and energy management are improved, but system reliability deteriorates when the controller goes offline

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the centralized control system into distributed intelligent nodes. Each PoE device or group of devices is assigned a local microprocessor that can independently make control decisions, segmenting the monolithic controller into multiple autonomous units that maintain operation even when others fail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The microprocessors are pre-programmed with control algorithms and decision-making logic before deployment. When communication with the central controller is lost, these pre-loaded instructions enable immediate autonomous operation without requiring real-time commands, ensuring continuous reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the system implements autonomous operation capability in nodes, then system reliability is improved during controller failures, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidnode complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements universal microprocessors in each node that can perform multiple functions: normal controlled operation when the central controller is active, and autonomous decision-making when communication is lost. This multi-functionality adds reliability without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Each node is equipped with self-service capabilities through embedded microprocessors that can independently monitor device status, manage power distribution, and execute control decisions without external intervention. This self-sufficiency enhances reliability while keeping individual node complexity manageable through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11353839B2Node and method of controlling devices connected to node
Publication Date: 2022.06.07 IGOR
  • US11353839B2 patent drawing
  • US11353839B2 patent drawing
  • US11353839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments relate to a node and a method of controlling devices connected to the node. In example embodiments the devices may be, but are not required to be, lights.