Point Cloud Comparator for Microscopic Variance Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual detection of subtle or microscopic changes in three-dimensional objects is prone to variability, inaccuracy, and subjectivity, making it challenging in industries such as agriculture, engineering, and medicine, where precise detection is crucial.

Innovation Solution

A point cloud comparator system that aligns and compares three-dimensional point clouds to objectively detect and quantify changes by isolating specific features using reference point clouds, correcting for misalignments, and analyzing positional and visual characteristics of data points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual detection is used to examine images of the object, then professional expertise can be applied to identify changes, but variability, inaccuracy, and subjectivity increase especially for subtle or microscopic changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidconsistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical examination process with an automated image processing system that uses algorithms to detect and quantify changes. The system processes images through multiple stages including preprocessing, change detection algorithms, and quantitative analysis, eliminating human subjectivity while maintaining high detection accuracy for subtle changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates standardized digital representations of changes by processing images through consistent algorithms. By copying and analyzing image data through automated procedures rather than human interpretation, the system ensures reproducible results with reduced variability across different examinations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If automated image processing is used to detect changes, then objectivity and consistency improve, but the ability to detect subtle or microscopic changes may be reduced without expert human judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconsistencyVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing steps including image preprocessing, enhancement, and feature extraction before final change detection. These preliminary automated actions prepare the data in ways that enable subsequent algorithms to detect subtle changes effectively, combining automated consistency with enhanced detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The image processing system divides the analysis into multiple segmented stages: preprocessing, change detection, validation, and quantification. Each segment handles specific aspects of the detection process, allowing the system to maintain consistency while progressively refining detection accuracy for subtle features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If multiple point clouds are aligned and compared, then detection accuracy for subtle changes improves, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary alignment and preprocessing of point clouds before detailed comparison. By pre-aligning point clouds using reference features and preprocessing operations, the system reduces the computational burden of subsequent detailed comparisons, maintaining high detection accuracy while reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The point cloud comparison process is segmented into multiple stages: coarse alignment, feature identification, detailed comparison, and validation. This segmentation allows the system to process point clouds efficiently by focusing computational resources on critical comparison stages rather than uniformly processing all data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If feature isolation is performed using reference point clouds, then quantification precision improves, but device complexity and processing steps increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantification precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses reference point clouds as intermediary structures to facilitate precise feature isolation and quantification. These reference structures serve as mediators between the raw point cloud data and the final measurement, enabling precise quantification while managing complexity through structured intermediate representations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11302015B2Systems and methods for automatic detection and quantification of point cloud variance
Publication Date: 2022.04.12 MIRIS INC
  • US11302015B2 patent drawing
  • US11302015B2 patent drawing
  • US11302015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A comparator may automatically detect and quantify subtle and/or microscopic variance to a feature of a three-dimensional (ā€œ3Dā€) object in a reproducible manner based on point cloud imaging of that 3D object. The comparator may isolate a first set of data points, that represent the object feature at a first time, in a reference point cloud, and may isolate a second set of data points, that represent the same but altered object feature at a different second time, in a non-reference point cloud. The comparator may detect variance between positional values and visual characteristic values of the second set of data points and the corresponding positional values and visual characteristic values of the first set of data points, and may quantify a change occurring to the object feature between the first time and the second time based on a mapping of the variance to a particular unit of measure.