Point Cloud Ground Classification Using Multi-Algorithm ML Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ground classification algorithms for point clouds are terrain-specific, require manual parameter tuning, and lack consideration of intensity information, leading to inaccuracies and inefficiencies in classifying ground points.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model trained on features derived from conventional ground classification algorithms, point cloud features, and contextual features, capable of providing ground classification probabilities without manual parameter tuning, improving accuracy and scalability across various terrains.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional ground classification algorithms are used, then classification can be performed, but accuracy is reduced due to terrain-specific limitations and lack of intensity information consideration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidterrain adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal ground classification system that works across multiple terrain types by integrating multiple existing algorithms (PMF, SMRF, TIN, CSF) into a single ensemble framework. This allows the system to adapt to different terrains automatically without requiring terrain-specific parameter tuning, resolving the contradiction between maintaining high accuracy across diverse terrains and avoiding terrain-specific limitations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple classification algorithms and feature types (spatial coordinates, intensity values, return numbers) into a composite classification approach. By fusing results from different algorithms and incorporating intensity information that individual algorithms ignore, the system achieves superior accuracy compared to any single algorithm, particularly in complex terrains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Measurement precision

If manual parameter tuning is performed for each algorithm, then classification accuracy may improve for specific terrains, but processing time and complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidparameter tuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-adjusting classification system where the ensemble framework automatically determines the optimal combination of algorithms and their weighting based on the input point cloud characteristics. This eliminates the need for manual parameter tuning by each user, as the system performs adaptive optimization automatically, saving significant time while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary optimization of algorithm parameters and weighting coefficients during the model training phase using training datasets. This preliminary action allows the system to be pre-configured for optimal performance across multiple terrain types, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual tuning during actual classification operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If multiple ground classification algorithms are applied, then classification robustness improves, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification robustnessVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification process by dividing the point cloud into overlapping windows and processing each window independently through the ensemble of algorithms. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different regions, maintaining robustness through multiple algorithm applications while improving overall processing efficiency through distributed computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a progressive classification approach where algorithms are applied in stages, and classification results are updated incrementally. The system performs partial classification passes, refining results iteratively, which reduces the computational burden compared to applying all algorithms simultaneously to the entire point cloud, thereby improving processing speed while maintaining robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260094413A1Machine learning techniques for ground classification
Publication Date: 2026.04.02 COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION INC
  • US20260094413A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094413A1 patent drawing
  • US20260094413A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Example systems, methods, and non-transitory computer readable media are directed to obtaining a point cloud that represents an environment based at least in part on a plurality of points in three-dimensional space; determining corresponding classifications of points in the point cloud as ground or not-ground based at least in part on a plurality of ground classification algorithms; determining respective point cloud features associated with the points in the point cloud; determining respective cell features associated with a plurality of cells that segment the point cloud; generating feature data for a machine learning model based at least in part on one or more of: the classifications of the points based on the plurality of ground classification algorithms, the point cloud features, or the cell features; and classifying the points in the point cloud based at least in part on an output from the machine learning model.