3D Point Cloud Boundary Estimation Using Motion-Based OOI Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods struggle to accurately extract the boundaries of an object of interest (OOI) from a large point cloud generated by a drone, as they fail to distinguish OOI points from background objects, leading to inefficiencies in modeling and documentation of telecommunication equipment like cell towers.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the estimation of the center of the OOI on the X-Y plane and identification of offsets along the z-axis, using a truncated point cloud formed by selecting points based on motion metrics from multiple images, to isolate relevant points and generate a reduced point cloud.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a large point cloud is generated to capture the entire area surrounding the OOI, then the coverage and completeness of the model is improved, but the difficulty of automatically extracting OOI points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidextraction difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large point cloud into multiple smaller subsets based on spatial distribution and motion characteristics. By dividing the point cloud into manageable chunks and processing them separately using motion metrics from multiple images, the system maintains comprehensive coverage while reducing the complexity of extracting OOI points from the entire dataset at once.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces motion metrics as a new parameter to distinguish OOI points from background points. By calculating motion characteristics across multiple images and using these metrics to filter and identify OOI points, the system transforms the extraction problem from a purely spatial task to one that incorporates temporal motion information, thereby improving extraction accuracy in large point clouds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If motion metrics are calculated for all N points using K images, then the accuracy of boundary estimation is improved, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboundary estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the set of N points into multiple subsets and processes each subset separately. Instead of calculating motion metrics for all points simultaneously, the system processes points in groups, reducing the computational burden at each step while maintaining overall accuracy through the aggregation of results from all subsets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent calculates motion metrics for a representative subset of points rather than exhaustively processing every single point with full computational detail. By using sampling and subset-based processing, the system achieves sufficient boundary estimation accuracy without the excessive computational cost of processing every point at maximum detail.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If the point cloud is reduced to a subset containing only P points, then the processing efficiency is improved, but the risk of losing relevant OOI data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoiddata completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses motion metrics as a filtering parameter to selectively retain points that exhibit characteristics consistent with OOI. By calculating motion metrics for points and using these metrics to identify and keep only those points with relevant motion patterns, the system reduces the point cloud to a manageable subset while maintaining high confidence that OOI data is preserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a feedback mechanism where motion metrics calculated from multiple images are used to iteratively refine the point cloud subset. Points are evaluated based on their motion characteristics, and the system feedback-loops to adjust the subset selection, ensuring that points are retained or removed based on their contribution to accurate OOI boundary estimation rather than arbitrary reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12524887B2Estimating boundaries of an object of interest (OOI) within a three-dimensional model of an area
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US12524887B2 patent drawing
  • US12524887B2 patent drawing
  • US12524887B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for estimating boundaries of an OOI. The method includes obtaining a first point cloud comprising a set of N points. The method also includes obtaining a set of K images. The method also includes, for each point included in the set of N points, identifying, for each one of the K images, the point's location within a 2D space corresponding to the image, thereby obtaining, for each point included in the set of N point, K location identifiers. The method also includes, for each point included in the set of N points, determining a motion metric for the point using the K location identifiers for the point. The method also includes using the N motion metrics to form a subset of the N points. The method also includes, for each point included in the subset of points, obtaining a location identifier for the point. The method also includes using the location identifiers to estimate a center of the OOI and then using the estimated center of the OOI to identify boundaries for the OOI.