3D Point Cloud Feature Detection via Probability Metric Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In 3D laser distance-measuring systems, identifying specific features within point clouds can be challenging due to occlusion by other surfaces, making it difficult for users to select and visualize desired points, especially when features are small, obstructed, or difficult to distinguish from neighboring features.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced that filters a subset of points based on criteria such as geometric location, color, or intensity, and evaluates a non-normalized probability metric to identify the point most likely representing the feature, allowing for custom view direction adjustments to enhance feature detection and visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional point cloud filtering methods are used to identify features, then the system can process the data, but features that are small, obstructed, or difficult to distinguish remain hard to detect accurately

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection accuracyVSAvoidfeature identifiability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary metric evaluation process between raw point cloud data and feature identification. This metric acts as a mediator that quantifies the likelihood of each point representing a feature, enabling accurate detection even when features are obscured or difficult to distinguish visually. The metric evaluates multiple criteria to bridge the gap between raw data and meaningful feature identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter space by introducing a probabilistic metric framework that evaluates points based on multiple characteristics simultaneously. Instead of relying on single visual criteria, the system transforms the identification problem into a metric evaluation problem, where points are scored based on their likelihood of representing features, thereby improving detection accuracy for difficult-to-distinguish features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If users manually manipulate and inspect point clouds to locate features, then they can identify features, but the process requires significant user time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature identification accuracyVSAvoiduser manipulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by automatically evaluating all points in the point cloud against the metric before user inspection. This pre-evaluation ranks points by their likelihood of representing features, so when users do inspect the data, they can focus on high-probability candidates rather than manually searching through entire point clouds, significantly reducing user time and effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-service by automatically identifying and ranking potential feature points using the metric evaluation process. This automation reduces the burden on users, who only need to review pre-filtered high-probability candidates rather than manually inspecting all points, thereby decreasing user manipulation time while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If the system provides detailed views of potential feature points, then users can verify feature detection, but the complexity of navigating and visualizing point cloud data increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature detection verificationVSAvoidvisualization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by providing detailed views and contextual information specifically at locations where features are likely to exist, rather than uniformly complicating the entire visualization system. The metric-driven approach ensures that enhanced visualization resources are concentrated on high-probability points, verifying feature detection where it matters most without unnecessarily increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8396284B2Smart picking in 3D point clouds
Publication Date: 2013.03.12 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS AG
  • US8396284B2 patent drawing
  • US8396284B2 patent drawing
  • US8396284B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment of the invention includes a method for identifying a point representing a feature in a 3D dataset. The method includes performing a pick, which includes filtering the dataset to extract a subset of points based on certain criteria including a seed point and evaluating a metric for each point in the subset of points. The metric is a non-normalized probability that the point being evaluated represents the feature. The point or points with the highest metric is identified as representing the feature. Another embodiment of the invention includes a computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions for identifying a point representing a feature in a 3D dataset. Another embodiment of the invention includes a method for displaying a view of a feature in a 3D dataset.