Point Cloud Decoding with Subgroup LoD and Neighbor Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for processing point cloud data are inefficient due to the high computational complexity and latency associated with encoding and decoding large volumes of data, requiring improved methods for efficient transmission and reception.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving and decoding point cloud data on a subgroup basis, generating levels of detail (LoD) using nodes from both the current and parent subgroups, and performing neighbor searches to derive attribute data efficiently, with separate storage for direct compression nodes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If point cloud data is processed using conventional encoding and decoding methods, then the data can be transmitted and received, but the computational operation becomes complicated and time-consuming due to the large volume of point cloud data

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidencoding/decoding time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the point cloud data into multiple subgroups based on spatial partitioning (e.g., octree structure). Each subgroup is processed independently through encoding and decoding operations, which reduces the computational complexity and time required compared to processing the entire point cloud as a single unit. This segmentation enables parallel processing and improves throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-processing point cloud data into subgroups and preparing decoding parameters before actual transmission and decoding operations. This includes pre-calculating spatial relationships, preparing attribute data mappings, and establishing decoding sequences, which reduces the computational burden during real-time decoding operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If point cloud data is processed using conventional methods, then encoding and decoding can be performed, but latency increases due to the large volume of data requiring processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the point cloud into subgroups, the patent enables selective decoding of only the necessary subgroups based on viewing requirements or spatial priorities. This reduces the total processing time and latency compared to decoding the entire point cloud, while maintaining the ability to process large volumes of data efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial decoding by processing only the necessary portions of the point cloud data (subgroups) rather than the entire dataset. This partial action approach reduces latency and processing time while maintaining sufficient detail for the application requirements, avoiding the excessive action of processing all data when not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If conventional encoding methods are used for large point cloud data, then compression can be achieved, but the computational complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata volumeVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the encoding process into independent operations on subgroups, where each subgroup is encoded using simplified rules compared to the entire dataset. This reduces the computational complexity per operation while still achieving effective compression of the large point cloud data through hierarchical processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different encoding strategies to different subgroups based on their local characteristics (e.g., spatial density, importance, viewing angle). This local quality approach allows the system to use more complex encoding only where necessary and simpler encoding where acceptable, reducing overall computational complexity while maintaining compression effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4654581A1Point cloud data transmission device, point cloud data transmission method, point cloud data reception device, and point cloud data reception method
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 LG ELECTRONICS INC
  • EP4654581A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4654581A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4654581A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A point cloud data reception method and device are provided. The point cloud data reception method according to embodiments may comprise the steps of: receiving geometry data, attribute data and signaling information; decoding the geometry data on the basis of the signaling information; decoding the attribute data on the basis of the signaling information and the decoded geometry data; and rendering point cloud data including the decoded geometry data and the decoded attribute data.