Autonomous Point Device State Querying for Master Controller Complexity Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

As security systems and home automation systems incorporate more point devices, the complexity of the master controller increases, leading to delays, errors, and limited versatility due to the need for explicit commands and manual interaction for each device, which affects power management and system reliability.

Innovation Solution

Point devices are configured to automatically determine the current system state by querying external devices and modify their operation accordingly, reducing the complexity of the master controller and enabling autonomous power management, even in the absence of timely commands from the master controller.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the master controller manages more point devices, then the system coverage and monitoring capability improve, but the master controller complexity increases leading to delays and errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coverageVSAvoidmaster controller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control functionality into two parts: the master controller handles system-level coordination while individual point devices handle their own operational decisions. This segmentation reduces the master controller's complexity by eliminating the need for it to manage every device's operational state directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Point devices autonomously determine the current system state by querying external devices and automatically modify their operation based on this state information. This self-service capability reduces the burden on the master controller, allowing it to scale without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If the master controller manages more point devices, then the system coverage improves, but processing delays and errors increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem coverageVSAvoidprocessing delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Point devices independently query external devices for system state information and automatically adjust their operation without waiting for master controller commands. This eliminates processing delays associated with master controller bottlenecking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Point devices proactively query for system state information before needing to make operational decisions, enabling them to anticipate and respond to system state changes without waiting for master controller instruction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If explicit commands are sent to each point device, then precise control is achieved, but the need for manual interaction increases reducing ease of operation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidmanual interaction requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Point devices automatically determine system state and adjust their operation without requiring explicit commands or manual interaction. This maintains precise control through autonomous decision-making while eliminating the operational burden of manual device-by-device configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Point devices query external devices for system state information and use this feedback to automatically modify their operation. This closed-loop approach enables precise control through autonomous response to system conditions rather than manual commanding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If the master controller manages all device operations, then centralized control is maintained, but system reliability decreases when the master controller is unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized control structureVSAvoidsystem availability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments control authority from the master controller to individual point devices. Each point device can independently determine system state and adjust its operation, maintaining functional autonomy even when the master controller is unavailable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Point devices autonomously query external devices for system state information and self-adjust their operation without requiring master controller availability. This distributes reliability across multiple independent nodes rather than creating a single point of failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10223902B2Methods and systems for operating a point device included in a system of point devices
Publication Date: 2019.03.05 ROBERT BOSCH CORP
  • US10223902B2 patent drawing
  • US10223902B2 patent drawing
  • US10223902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for operating a point device included in a system of point devices. One method includes transmitting a query, with a transceiver included in the point device, to at least one device external to the point device for system state information and receiving, with the transceiver, a response from at least one device external to the point device in response to the query. The method also includes determining, with an electronic processor included in the point device, a current state of the system of point devices based on the received response and automatically modifying, with the electronic processor, operation of the point device based on the current state of the system of point devices.