Point-in-polygon location tracking via cell partitioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object location tracking methods, such as ray casting algorithms, consume significant computing resources when processing complex polygons, leading to processing delays and potential hardware failures when determining if an object's location is within a geographic area.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a locating technique that partitions a bounding area into cells of varying precision, allowing for efficient determination of whether a location is within a geographic area by classifying cells as entirely or partially within the area, and applying the point-in-polygon algorithm only when necessary, thereby conserving computing resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ray casting algorithm is used to determine whether a location is within a geographic area, then the determination can be made, but computing resources are consumed significantly and processing delays occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the geographic area determination process into two stages: first, a quick bounding box check that provides an immediate preliminary result, and second, the more computationally intensive point-in-polygon algorithm that is only executed when the bounding box check indicates the point might be inside the polygon. This segmentation allows most queries to be resolved quickly without invoking the resource-intensive algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs a preliminary bounding box check before executing the full point-in-polygon algorithm. This preliminary action filters out points that are clearly outside the geographic area based on their bounding box coordinates, preventing unnecessary execution of the computationally expensive ray casting algorithm for points that will definitely be outside the polygon.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If ray casting algorithm processes complex polygons with many sides, then accurate location determination is achieved, but computing resources are overburdened leading to hardware failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation accuracyVSAvoidsystem stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by using the bounding box check as a sufficient condition for many cases. If the bounding box of a location point does not intersect with the polygon's bounding box, the system immediately determines the point is outside without performing the full point-in-polygon test. This partial approach maintains accuracy for definitive cases while avoiding excessive computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The determination process is divided into a first segmentation (bounding box check) and a second segmentation (point-in-polygon algorithm). The bounding box segmentation handles the majority of cases with minimal computation, while the point-in-polygon segmentation is reserved for edge cases where the bounding box check is inconclusive, thus distributing computational load effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If point-in-polygon algorithm is applied to all locations, then accurate geographic area determination is achieved, but processing time increases from minutes to hours or days

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeographic area determination accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a preliminary bounding box filtering step that quickly eliminates points outside the geographic area's bounding box before applying the point-in-polygon algorithm. This preliminary action reduces the number of points requiring full algorithmic processing from potentially millions to a much smaller subset, dramatically reducing total processing time while maintaining accuracy for points that require detailed analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial action by applying the bounding box check as a sufficient filtering mechanism. For points failing the bounding box check, no further processing is performed as the result is already determined. This partial approach avoids the excessive time cost of applying the full point-in-polygon algorithm universally, while maintaining precision where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11140513B2Object location tracking based on point-in-polygon analysis
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US11140513B2 patent drawing
  • US11140513B2 patent drawing
  • US11140513B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device can receive location data associated with an object. The device can determine a bounding area that encompasses a geographic area and determine a partitioning of the bounding area into a plurality of cells. The device can classify a cell of the plurality of cells as a first type that is entirely within the geographic area or a second type that is partially within the geographic area. The device can determine a rounded value of a latitude and a longitude included in the location data to identify a proximate location. The device can determine whether the proximate location matches a reference location associated with a vertex of the cell and identify the location as within the cell. The device, based on identifying the location as within the cell, can selectively determine whether the location of the object is within the geographic area and perform one or more actions.