Randomized Point Set Geometry Verification for Image Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video signal processing techniques are computationally expensive and incur high communication costs, making them unsuitable for real-time operation in content delivery networks (CDNs) and other applications, and they struggle with noise and imperfections in image matching, leading to inaccurate visual object recognition.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for randomized point set geometry verification for image identification, which involves computing interesting points sets, determining matching pairs, sorting by distance, calculating a topology code distance vector, and using a decision tree classifier to verify geometric consistency and improve matching accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing video signal processing techniques are used, then image matching accuracy can be improved, but computational cost and communication costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage matching accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image matching process into two stages: a fast initial matching stage using simplified criteria, and a verification stage using geometric consistency checks only on candidate matches. This segmentation reduces overall computational cost by avoiding expensive operations on all image data, while maintaining high matching accuracy through the two-stage approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial verification by checking geometric consistency only for a subset of matching point pairs rather than all possible pairs. By selecting a representative sample of matches for verification, the system achieves sufficient accuracy without the full computational burden of exhaustive verification, thus reducing computational cost while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Measurement precision

If existing video signal processing techniques are used, then image matching accuracy can be improved, but communication costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage matching accuracyVSAvoidcommunication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the essential geometric relationships between matching points rather than transmitting complete image data. By focusing communication and computation on the critical geometric consistency information of matched point pairs, the system reduces communication costs while maintaining the accuracy needed for reliable image matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Productivity

If traditional image matching methods are used, then processing speed can be maintained, but accuracy deteriorates due to noise and imperfections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidmatching accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback through geometric consistency verification that corrects and refines initial matching results. By checking whether matched point pairs maintain consistent geometric relationships and using this feedback to reject incorrect matches, the system improves accuracy without significantly reducing processing speed, as the verification operates on already-identified candidates rather than performing exhaustive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9875386B2System and method for randomized point set geometry verification for image identification
Publication Date: 2018.01.23 FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9875386B2 patent drawing
  • US9875386B2 patent drawing
  • US9875386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Object recognition can be improved by verifying a geometric consistency between matching interesting points pairs of two images, as objects with the images are more likely to match when the matching interesting points pairs are geometrically consistent. The geometric consistency between matching interesting points pairs can be verified in accordance with a topology code distance vector (D). The topology code distance vector (D) may be evaluated in accordance with a decision tree classifier, which may be trained in accordance with previous or historic topology code distance vectors. The topology code distance vector (D) may be computed from a subset of matching interesting points pairs having the shortest matching distance.