Pointed Guard for Sickle Cutter High-Speed Harvesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Sickle knife cutting systems face limitations in cutting efficiency at higher ground speeds, leading to reduced productivity and increased stubble length, particularly when harvesting crops like soybeans and hay, where current systems struggle to maintain effective cutting at speeds above 5-10 mph.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a sickle cutting apparatus with wider guard fingers and longer, narrower knife blades, featuring a pointed tip and serrated edges, which allows for increased cutting efficiency by shedding crop material to the sides and reducing pushing action, enabling higher ground speeds while maintaining acceptable stubble length.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional pointed guards with integral construction are used, then ease of adjustment and manufacturing are improved, but cutting efficiency at higher ground speeds deteriorates and stubble length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of adjustment and manufacturingVSAvoidcutting efficiency at higher ground speeds
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The guard is divided into separate components: a base piece with ledger surface and multiple removable finger pieces that can be independently adjusted. This segmentation allows for precise positioning of the shearing edges relative to the blade while maintaining ease of assembly and adjustment, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing simplicity and cutting efficiency at high speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The finger pieces are made adjustable rather than fixed, allowing the guard configuration to be dynamically optimized for different cutting conditions and ground speeds. This dynamic adjustability enables maintenance of effective cutting geometry across varying operational parameters, improving productivity without sacrificing ease of adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If conventional sickle blades with wider front edges are used, then structural strength is improved, but crop shedding capability deteriorates and pushing action increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strength of bladeVSAvoidcrop shedding capability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The blade cross-section varies along its length: narrower at the front edge for effective crop shedding and beveled side edges, and wider at the base for structural strength. This local variation in geometry allows the blade to simultaneously achieve crop shedding capability at the cutting edge and structural integrity at the base, resolving the contradiction between strength and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The blade design incorporates beveled side edges that create a three-dimensional cutting surface, allowing the cutting action to occur across multiple planes. This dimensional approach enhances crop shedding capability while maintaining structural strength through the beveled geometry and appropriate base width.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Manufacturing precision

If guard fingers are made narrower and longer, then cutting precision and crop shedding are improved, but structural strength and stability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting precisionVSAvoidstructural strength of guard fingers
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The guard is segmented into multiple finger pieces that can be independently positioned. This segmentation allows each finger to be optimized for precision cutting with narrower dimensions while the overall guard structure provides structural support, resolving the contradiction between cutting precision and structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base piece acts as an intermediary structure that supports the narrower, longer finger pieces. The base provides the necessary structural strength and stability, allowing the fingers to be optimized for precision cutting without compromising overall guard strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If ground speed is increased to improve productivity, then harvesting efficiency is improved, but cutting effectiveness deteriorates and stubble length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidcutting effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The adjustable finger pieces allow the guard configuration to be dynamically optimized for different ground speeds. At higher speeds, the fingers can be positioned to maintain effective shearing geometry, ensuring cutting effectiveness is preserved even as productivity increases through higher ground speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The design allows modification of geometric parameters (finger position, blade-to-ledger gap) to optimize cutting performance at different operating speeds. By adjusting these parameters, the system maintains effective cutting geometry across a range of ground speeds, enabling increased productivity without sacrificing cutting effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10368484B2Pointed guard for sickle cutter system
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 MACDON INDS
  • US10368484B2 patent drawing
  • US10368484B2 patent drawing
  • US10368484B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a sickle cutting system including a plurality of guard fingers at spaced positions across a cutter bar across which a reciprocating sickle knife passes, each guard finger has a forwardly projecting tip portion in front of a ledger surface and a rearwardly projecting tang portion connected to a rear end of the tip portion and extending therefrom over the ledger surface to a rear edge of the tang portion located over the blade. The lower surface of the tang portion includes a first portion adjacent the tip portion which is generally parallel to the ledger surface and a second portion adjacent the rear edge which is inclined at an angle away from the ledger surface. The width of the tang portion across the rear of the tang portion is equal to or greater than 1.5 inches.