Out-of-Process Pointer Styles for Privacy-Preserving UI Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer user input systems struggle to balance user privacy and efficiency, particularly in extended reality systems, as applications often have unrestricted access to user input data, including preliminary interactions, which can compromise privacy.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system where user input and rendering are managed by a trusted operating system process separate from the application, allowing for out-of-process pointer styles and resizing effects, ensuring that preliminary interactions are rendered without revealing sensitive data to the application.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If applications have unrestricted access to user input data including preliminary interactions, then application functionality and responsiveness are improved, but user privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication responsivenessVSAvoidprivacy compromise
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the user input processing into two distinct pathways: preliminary interactions are processed by the operating system in isolation, while confirmed interactions are then provided to the application. This segmentation allows the OS to handle preliminary input rendering without exposing sensitive data to the application, thus maintaining privacy while ensuring responsive feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The operating system acts as an intermediary between the user input device and the application. It receives preliminary user inputs, processes them independently to generate appropriate rendered feedback, and only passes confirmed interactions to the application. This intermediary role enables the system to maintain application responsiveness while protecting user privacy by filtering what data the application receives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a trusted operating system process manages user input separately from the application, then user privacy is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The operating system provides self-service by independently processing preliminary user interactions and generating appropriate rendered feedback without requiring application involvement. The OS autonomously determines which interactions are preliminary versus confirmed, manages the separation of concerns, and only engages the application when necessary for confirmed inputs, thereby reducing the complexity burden on the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If preliminary interactions are rendered without revealing sensitive data to the application, then user privacy is maintained, but application efficiency may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy maintenanceVSAvoidapplication efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The operating system performs preliminary actions by processing and rendering feedback for preliminary interactions before involving the application. This preliminary processing eliminates the need for the application to handle every minor input event, reserving application resources for more significant confirmed interactions, thus maintaining application efficiency while preserving privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by having the operating system handle only the necessary portion of user interactions (preliminary ones) independently, while leaving confirmed interactions to the application. This selective division of labor prevents the application from being overwhelmed by every input event while still maintaining privacy for preliminary interactions, optimizing overall system efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250377911A1Out-of-process pointer styles and resizing effects for electronic devices
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 APPLE INC
  • US20250377911A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377911A1 patent drawing
  • US20250377911A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Out-of-process hit-testing can provide privacy in computer user input systems. In an aspect, an application specifies a pointer style for a pointer element according to a location of the pointer element in relation to bounded regions of a UI window. In another aspect, an application specifies a resize effect for a UI element which when triggered by out-of-process hit testing, causes a UI element to change from a first state to a second state.