Polar Code Partitioning for Reliable Higher-Order Modulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polar coding techniques do not effectively consider the varying bit reliabilities of higher-order modulation schemes like QAM, leading to inefficient encoding and decoding processes.

Innovation Solution

Partitioning the polar code into multiple sub-blocks with consistent block lengths and associating each sub-block with different reliability levels, followed by bit interleaving and rate matching techniques such as shortening and puncturing, to optimize encoding for higher-order modulation schemes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional polar coding techniques are used for higher-order modulation schemes, then the encoding and decoding processes are simpler, but the bit reliability is not optimized leading to inefficient transmission

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebit reliabilityVSAvoidencoding complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The polar code is divided into multiple sub-blocks, each associated with different reliability levels. This segmentation allows the system to optimize encoding for higher-order modulation schemes by treating bits with different reliability requirements separately, thus improving overall transmission reliability without excessively increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different sub-blocks are assigned different reliability characteristics based on their position and importance. This local quality approach ensures that critical bits receive enhanced protection through more reliable bit channels, while less critical bits use simpler channels, optimizing the overall system performance for higher-order modulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If polar code is partitioned into multiple sub-blocks with different reliability levels, then encoding efficiency is improved, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveencoding efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the polar code into multiple sub-blocks, the encoding process can be parallelized and optimized for different reliability requirements. This segmentation improves encoding efficiency by allowing independent processing of each sub-block, reducing the overall processing time despite the increased structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The polar code is pre-partitioned into sub-blocks with assigned reliability levels before the actual encoding process. This preliminary organization allows the encoder to efficiently process each sub-block according to its specific requirements, improving overall encoding efficiency while managing complexity through structured preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If bit interleaving and rate matching are applied to optimize encoding for higher-order modulation, then transmission reliability is improved, but latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission reliabilityVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Bit interleaving is applied separately to different sub-blocks rather than to the entire code block. This segmented approach maintains transmission reliability by ensuring proper bit distribution across reliable channels, while reducing latency by enabling parallel interleaving operations on smaller sub-blocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Rate matching is selectively applied to specific sub-blocks based on their reliability requirements and the modulation scheme being used. This partial application of rate matching optimizes transmission reliability for critical sub-blocks while minimizing the overall processing time and latency introduced by rate matching operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250279852A1Polar coding techniques for higher-order modulation
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250279852A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279852A1 patent drawing
  • US20250279852A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. In some examples, a transmitting device, such as a user equipment (UE) or a network entity, may encode an information bit vector into multiple code blocks using a polar code partitioned into multiple sub-blocks having a same block length in accordance with a polar transformation associated with a modulation scheme. In some examples, each code block of the multiple code blocks may be encoded using a respective sub-block of the multiple sub-blocks. Additionally, the transmitting device may interleave respective bits of each code block of the multiple code blocks using a respective interleaver of multiple interleavers. As such, the transmitting device may transmit the respective interleaved bits of each code block of the multiple code blocks over a respective bit channel of multiple bit channels, where each bit channel of the multiple bit channels is associated with a respective reliability.