Polar Decoder Graph Decomposition for Low-Latency Parallel Decoding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polar decoder hardware implementations suffer from poor hardware efficiency, high memory bandwidth requirements, and limited parallelism due to data dependencies, leading to increased latency and reduced throughput in polar decoding processes.

Innovation Solution

A novel polar decoder architecture that processes several consecutive stages simultaneously, reducing memory requirements and enhancing parallelism, allowing for flexible support of different kernel block sizes and optimizing hardware resource usage by decomposing the polar code graph into columns and rows, enabling efficient partial sum propagation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If polar decoding is performed using conventional hardware implementations with sequential stage processing, then data dependencies are properly managed, but hardware efficiency is poor and latency is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding throughputVSAvoidhardware efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The polar code graph is decomposed into multiple columns, where each column contains a subset of stages. This segmentation allows independent parallel processing of columns while maintaining data dependency constraints within each column, thereby improving hardware efficiency and reducing latency without compromising decoding correctness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a column-based dimensional organization to the traditional stage-based sequential processing. By arranging stages into columns and processing them in parallel along the column dimension, the system achieves higher throughput while managing data dependencies through careful column ordering and memory organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Speed

If memory bandwidth is increased to support higher parallelism, then decoding speed improves, but memory bandwidth requirements become excessively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding latencyVSAvoidmemory bandwidth requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

By dividing the polar code graph into columns that can be processed independently, the patent reduces the amount of data that needs to be transferred through memory at any given time. Each column processes a subset of stages with localized data access patterns, thereby reducing overall memory bandwidth requirements while maintaining parallel processing benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent processes columns in a staged manner rather than all simultaneously, using partial parallelism that balances throughput requirements with memory bandwidth constraints. This allows the system to achieve improved latency without requiring peak memory bandwidth that would be necessary for full simultaneous column processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If data dependencies are strictly enforced in sequential order, then decoding accuracy is maintained, but parallelism is limited and throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding throughputVSAvoiddecoding accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the polar code graph into columns where data dependencies are contained within each column. This allows columns to be processed in parallel while maintaining the correctness of dependency relationships within each segment, thereby achieving both high throughput and decoding accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically determines the processing order of columns based on data dependency analysis. By flexibly ordering column processing and allowing adaptive parallelism where dependencies permit, the system maintains decoding accuracy while maximizing throughput potential

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Device complexity

If hardware resources are optimized for fixed block sizes, then hardware efficiency improves, but adaptability to different kernel block sizes is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware efficiencyVSAvoidsupport for different block sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The column-based architecture provides a universal framework that can accommodate different kernel block sizes by adjusting the number and configuration of columns. The same hardware structure can be reconfigured to process various block sizes efficiently, achieving both hardware efficiency and adaptability through parameterizable column organization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11165448B2Low latency polar coding and decoding by merging of states of the polar code graph
Publication Date: 2021.11.02 ACCELERCOMM LTD
  • US11165448B2 patent drawing
  • US11165448B2 patent drawing
  • US11165448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polar decoder kernal is described. The polar decoder kernal is configured to: receive one or more soft bits from a soft kernal encoded block having a block size of N and output one or more recovered kernal information bits from a recovered kernal information block having a block size of N. The polar decoder kernal comprises a decomposition of a polar code graph into an arbitrary number of columns depending on the kernal block size N.