Pole Sleeve Box Reinforcement for Ground-Line Rot Repair

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for reinstating poles using bridging beams face challenges in effectively identifying and addressing damage, particularly at the ground level where rot and decay occur, leading to potential failures that disrupt utilities and pose safety risks.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a bridging beam construction with a sleeve and secondary member forming a box section reinforcement, where the sleeve is abutted against the pole with the secondary member slid into reinforcing engagement, secured using strapping, bolts, and ferrules, to provide enhanced strength and stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a heavy gauge steel sleeve is used to form a bridging beam, then the strength and reliability of the pole reinforcement is improved, but the weight and cost of the reinforcement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrength of bridging beamVSAvoidweight of bridging beam
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bridging beam is divided into two separate components: a sleeve that fits over the pole and a secondary member that slides into the sleeve. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and assembled on-site, reducing the need for excessively heavy single-piece construction while maintaining overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bridging beam combines the sleeve and secondary member into a composite structure where the secondary member (potentially lighter material) is contained within the sleeve (steel structure). This composite approach allows the use of lighter gauge steel for the sleeve while the secondary member provides additional strength, reducing overall weight while maintaining required strength levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Device complexity

If a simple steel sleeve is used as a bridging beam, then the device complexity is reduced, but the strength and stability of the reinforcement is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of bridging beam constructionVSAvoidstrength of bridging beam
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement system is segmented into a simple sleeve component and a separate secondary member. The sleeve provides the basic structural framework with reduced complexity, while the secondary member slides into the sleeve to provide additional strength. This segmentation allows the simple sleeve to be easily manufactured and installed, while the combined structure achieves the required strength levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Loss of time

If the bridging beam is installed only at ground level, then the installation time and cost are reduced, but the pole reinforcement is insufficient because rot and decay spread vertically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation timeVSAvoidreliability of pole reinforcement
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The bridging beam is extended vertically in the dimension along the pole, with the sleeve and secondary member forming a structure that extends both above and below ground level. This vertical extension along the pole dimension ensures coverage of the rot-prone zone and provides continuous reinforcement as rot spreads vertically, while the modular design keeps installation time reasonable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Strength

If drilling holes through the pole is used to secure the bridging beam, then the attachment strength is improved, but the pole structure is further weakened and installation becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment strengthVSAvoidcomplexity of installation process
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of drilling holes through the pole to attach the bridging beam, the approach is inverted: the sleeve and secondary member are assembled into a box section structure that encloses and reinforces the pole, then the entire assembly is secured using external fastening methods like strapping or clamps. This inversion avoids creating holes through the already compromised pole while maintaining strong attachment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS7815157B2Reinforcing poles
Publication Date: 2010.10.19 POLE FOUND FINANCE
  • US7815157B2 patent drawing
  • US7815157B2 patent drawing
  • US7815157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for reinstating a pole standing in ground comprising, abutting an inner surface of a sleeve against an outer surface of the pole so as to have a lower portion of the sleeve penetrating the ground and an upper portion of the sleeve projecting above the ground, and sliding a secondary member against an outer surface of the sleeve so that the secondary member locates against the sleeve and projects above the ground and into the ground, wherein the construction is such that the sleeve and secondary member located against the sleeve jointly form a bridging beam incorporating a box section reinforcement of the bridging beam. The formation of this box section substantially improves the strength of the bridging beam above what would be expected from the strength of the individual components.