Policy-Driven IoT Relationship Management for Scalable Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Managing complex relationships between IoT entities in large-scale deployments is burdensome and inefficient, particularly in scenarios where relationships are short-lived and dynamic, relying on user configuration is not scalable, and existing IoT platforms lack the capability to define and manage relationship criteria.

Innovation Solution

A Relationship Management Service (RM Service) automates the establishment, modification, and tear-down of relationships between IoT entities based on predefined policies, using RM Policies to manage compatibility, dependency, state, location, and schedule relationships, and dynamically collecting context to trigger these actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If user configuration is used to manage relationships between IoT entities, then ease of operation is maintained for simple cases, but scalability deteriorates in large-scale deployments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the relationship management service automatically establishes, modifies, and tears down relationships between IoT entities based on predefined policies and dynamically collected context, eliminating the need for manual user configuration in large-scale deployments while maintaining simplicity through policy-based rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining relationship management policies that specify criteria for establishing, modifying, and tearing down relationships. These policies are configured in advance and automatically executed when contextual conditions are met, enabling scalable automation without real-time user intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual relationship management is used, then flexibility in handling complex scenarios is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to user burden

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The relationship management service performs self-service automation by automatically collecting contextual information, evaluating it against predefined policies, and executing relationship management actions without user intervention, thereby maintaining flexibility through policy-based decision-making while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by dynamically collecting contextual information about IoT entities and their environments, continuously evaluating this feedback against predefined policies, and automatically adjusting relationship states accordingly. This closed-loop approach maintains flexibility while eliminating manual management overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If existing IoT platforms are used without relationship management capability, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability deteriorates due to inability to define and manage relationship criteria

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The relationship management service acts as an intermediary layer between IoT entities and the underlying platform, providing relationship management capabilities without increasing device complexity. It collects contextual information, evaluates policies, and manages relationships at the service layer, leaving devices simple while enhancing overall system adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments relationship management functionality into a separate service layer component that operates independently from IoT devices. This segmentation allows the platform to remain simple while the relationship management service provides sophisticated adaptability through policy-based control and contextual evaluation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250267195A1Automated relationship management of service layer entities in a communications network
Publication Date: 2025.08.21 IPLA HLDG INC
  • US20250267195A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267195A1 patent drawing
  • US20250267195A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are described to automate managing of relationships between IoT entities (e.g., devices, apps, users) and offloading the burden of managing these relationships from users. A Relationship Management Service (RM Service) is described herein for the autonomous establishment, modification, and tear-down of relationships between IoT entities.