Policy-Driven Reader Groups for Streaming Workload Distribution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing streaming storage systems lack advanced frameworks for managing reader groups in a way that achieves policy-driven workload distribution across readers, beyond basic correctness and best-effort balancing, which is essential for efficient data processing and user experience.

Innovation Solution

A framework is introduced that augments the reader group abstraction with reader metadata to apply high-level policies, enabling intelligent workload distribution and policy-driven reader behavior, allowing users to define specific goals for data consumption and supporting legacy applications without code changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If basic reader group abstraction is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but workload distribution efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload distribution efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a policy engine as an intermediary component between the reader group abstraction and the actual data processing operations. This policy engine receives reader metadata, applies high-level policies to determine optimal workload distribution, and generates assignment decisions without requiring changes to the underlying reader group structure. This resolves the contradiction by adding intelligence through a mediating layer rather than fundamentally complicating the core abstraction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the workload distribution function into separate components: reader metadata collection, policy evaluation, and assignment generation. By dividing the workload management into distinct modular components (policy engine, metadata handlers, assignment logic), the system achieves efficient workload distribution while maintaining manageable complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If advanced policy-driven frameworks are implemented, then workload distribution intelligence is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload distribution intelligenceVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The policy-driven framework operates autonomously by automatically collecting reader metadata, evaluating applicable policies, and generating workload assignments without requiring manual intervention. The system self-manages the complex policy evaluation process, allowing users to benefit from intelligent workload distribution while the system handles the operational complexity internally, thus maintaining ease of operation despite advanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects reader metadata and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust workload assignments based on current system state and policy requirements. This automated feedback loop enables intelligent workload distribution while simplifying operation, as the system automatically adapts to changing conditions without requiring users to manually configure or adjust settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If reader metadata is collected and processed, then policy-driven control is improved, but processing time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy-driven control capabilityVSAvoidmetadata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-defining multiple high-level policies and their associated evaluation criteria before runtime. Reader metadata is collected and prepared in advance, and the policy engine is pre-configured with the logic needed to evaluate assignments. This preliminary preparation reduces the time required for actual policy-driven control decisions during operation, as the heavy lifting of policy configuration and metadata collection occurs beforehand.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The policy engine processes only the necessary subset of metadata and policies relevant to each specific workload assignment decision, rather than evaluating all possible metadata and policies uniformly. This selective processing approach maintains adaptability and versatility by considering relevant factors while reducing overall processing time by avoiding unnecessary evaluations of irrelevant data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250373683A1Method and system for policy-driven consumer groups for streaming storage systems
Publication Date: 2025.12.04 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250373683A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373683A1 patent drawing
  • US20250373683A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for managing a reader group (RG) includes: obtaining a first metadata, a second metadata, and a policy, in which a first reader (FR) and a second reader (SR) are a part of the RG; analyzing the obtained metadata to infer a user's goal and information; distributing, based on the goal and information, a first segment to the FR and a second segment to the SR; making a first determination that a number of readers in the RG is changed; making a second determination that a third reader (TR) is added to the RG; obtaining a third metadata of the FR, a fourth metadata of the SR, and a fifth metadata of the TR; analyzing the obtained metadata to infer second information; and re-distributing, based on the goal and the second information, the first segment to the SR and second segment to the TR.