Policy Testing System for Expense Savings Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating the financial impact of corporate expense policies, such as those for employee travel, often rely on theoretical or peer-comparison bases, failing to provide a reality-based assessment of actual savings under a company's specific business practices.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that allows for the practical evaluation of financial effects by assigning and testing multiple expense policies on specific groups within a company, calculating and comparing actual costs over time, and providing data-driven insights for policy refinement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If theoretical or peer-comparison methods are used to evaluate policy financial effects, then evaluation can be performed without implementing the policy, but the accuracy and reality-based assessment of actual savings is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of savings assessmentVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary testing by assigning test policies to test groups before full implementation. This allows evaluation of financial effects in advance using actual business practices while isolating variables through controlled group assignments, thereby achieving accurate savings assessment without committing the entire organization to untested policies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the organization into multiple test groups that can be assigned different policies for comparison. This segmentation enables parallel testing of multiple policies against actual business practices, providing reality-based assessment data while maintaining operational continuity in different segments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If multiple policies are tested on specific groups with actual cost calculation, then reality-based evaluation accuracy improves, but the system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereality-based evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary testing framework that mediates between policy proposals and full implementation. This framework includes test group assignment mechanisms, cost calculation modules, and comparison engines that process data systematically, enabling reality-based evaluation while managing complexity through structured intermediate processing layers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where actual costs incurred by test groups under different policies are calculated, compared, and used to refine policy evaluations. This feedback mechanism provides continuous reality-based assessment data while automating the complexity of data collection, processing, and analysis through systemized feedback channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7743002B2Method and system for testing of policies to determine cost savings
Publication Date: 2010.06.22 DEEM
  • US7743002B2 patent drawing
  • US7743002B2 patent drawing
  • US7743002B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and system for testing policies to determine cost savings, which in one embodiment comprises receiving identities of a set of one or more persons associated within an organization, the one or more person's travel related expenditures are to be governed by at least a first and second policy; from the set of one or more persons, identifying a first group governed by the first policy and identifying a second group governed by the second policy; identifying the travel costs incurred by the first group and costs incurred by the second group; and following the passage of a predetermined period of time, in view of the respective separate policies, performing a cost analysis on travel costs incurred by the first group during the predetermined period of time and the travel costs incurred by the second group during the predetermined period of time.