Policy Validation via Signature Blocks and Metadata

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of access policies in cloud environments often leads to inaccuracies in predicting policy impacts due to the inability to determine the source or modifications of policies, resulting in potential breaches and compliance issues.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a policy validation system that includes a policy manager, validators, and a claims manager to validate and canonicalize policies, attach signature blocks for verification, and store metadata to track policy generation and modifications, ensuring compliance and accountability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a robust and flexible policy framework is provided to meet user access control needs, then policy capabilities are improved, but policy complexity increases leading to inaccurate predictions and enforcement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy capabilitiesVSAvoidpolicy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the policy system into distinct components: policy definitions, validation rules, metadata structures, and enforcement mechanisms. This segmentation allows each component to be independently managed and validated, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining flexible policy capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary validation of policies against predefined rules before policies are enforced. This preliminary action ensures policies are syntactically correct and semantically valid, preventing complex or erroneous policies from being deployed and causing issues during enforcement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Device complexity

If policy source and modification tracking is not implemented, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to predict policy impact and determine policy source is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidpolicy source information
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms through metadata that tracks policy source, version, and modification history. This feedback loop provides visibility into policy changes and their origins, enabling accurate impact prediction while maintaining systematic tracking without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces metadata as an intermediary layer between policy definitions and enforcement. This metadata carries source information, version data, and validation results, enabling traceability and impact analysis without directly complicating the core policy enforcement mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If policies are not validated before enforcement, then processing speed is improved, but policy accuracy and compliance are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolicy processing speedVSAvoidpolicy accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary validation of policies against syntax and semantic rules before enforcement. This preliminary action ensures policies are correct and compliant upfront, preventing errors during enforcement while maintaining processing efficiency through automated validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual policy review processes with automated validation mechanisms that check policies against predefined rules. This substitution maintains processing speed by using algorithmic validation rather than human review, while improving policy accuracy through consistent rule-based checking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10691822B1Policy validation management
Publication Date: 2020.06.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10691822B1 patent drawing
  • US10691822B1 patent drawing
  • US10691822B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Validated policies can be utilized where information regarding the validation travels with the policies. A policy validator can validate information about a policy, such as may relate to compliance with policy requirements and accuracy of the policy output. Information about the validation, such as one or more claims of validity and information about the validator, can be provided with the policy as metadata, such as in a signature block. The signatures, or other verification mechanisms, can be used to ensure that the policy is not modified after the validation. When attempting to utilize the policy, the signature block can be evaluated along with the policy to determine whether to grant the access. In some embodiments the signature block may not be evaluated with the policy, but may be used subsequently for auditing or compliance determinations.