Polishing Apparatus Weighted Average Rate Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) methods face challenges in maintaining a stable polishing rate due to variations in surface conditions of the polishing pad, pad conditioner, polishing liquid composition, temperature, and material properties, leading to irregularities in film thickness and increased manufacturing costs and yield loss.

Innovation Solution

A polishing apparatus equipped with a measurement section to input desired film thickness, store polishing rate data, and calculate optimal polishing time using a weighted average method, incorporating a calibration substrate for maintaining measurement accuracy and accounting for variations in polishing rate data to prevent excessive polishing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If conventional CMP methods are used with average polishing rate calculation, then measurement complexity is reduced, but film thickness control precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement complexityVSAvoidfilm thickness control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements on a test substrate before actual polishing to determine the specific polishing rate. This preliminary action allows the system to establish accurate polishing parameters in advance, ensuring precise film thickness control during subsequent production polishing without requiring complex real-time measurement systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The polishing apparatus uses itself to perform measurements and determine polishing rates through automated measurement and calculation functions. The system self-calibrates by measuring test substrates and automatically adjusting polishing parameters, eliminating the need for external complex measurement equipment while maintaining high precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If polishing time is extended to ensure adequate polishing, then film thickness uniformity improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm thickness uniformityVSAvoidpolishing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts polishing parameters including pressure, speed, and time based on measured polishing rates from test substrates. By optimizing these parameters specifically for each polishing condition, the system achieves uniform film thickness with shorter polishing times, thereby maintaining high productivity while ensuring quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by measuring actual polishing rates on test substrates and using this information to adjust polishing time and other parameters for production substrates. This closed-loop feedback ensures optimal polishing time is used, achieving uniform thickness without excessive polishing time that would reduce productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If polishing rate variations are accommodated by increasing safety margins, then film thickness accuracy improves, but polishing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilm thickness accuracyVSAvoidpolishing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary measurements to determine actual polishing rates before production polishing. By knowing the specific polishing rate in advance through preliminary testing, the system can calculate the exact polishing time needed without adding excessive safety margins, thus achieving accurate film thickness control without unnecessary time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures accurate film thickness control, reduces reworking, and minimizes yield loss by stabilizing the polishing process and optimizing polishing time, thereby maintaining manufacturing efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Implementation Method 1

a measurement section for measuring a thickness of a film formed on the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical interference: Interference

Implementation Method 2

a polishing section for pressing the substrate against a polishing surface so as to bring the substrate into sliding contact with the polishing surface to polish the substrate

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical abrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 3

In the chemical mechanical polishing, with use of a polishing apparatus, while a polishing liquid containing abrasive particles such as silica (SiO2) therein is supplied onto a polishing surface such as a polishing pad, a substrate such as a semiconductor wafer is brought into sliding contact with the polishing surface, so that the substrate is polished

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical mechanical polishing:

Data Source

PatentUS8025759B2Polishing apparatus and polishing method
Publication Date: 2011.09.27 EBARA CORP
  • US8025759B2 patent drawing
  • US8025759B2 patent drawing
  • US8025759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A polishing apparatus has a polishing section (302) configured to polish a substrate and a measurement section (307) configured to measure a thickness of a film formed on the substrate. The polishing apparatus also has an interface (310) configured to input a desired thickness of a film formed on a substrate to be polished and a storage device (308a) configured to store polishing rate data on at least one past substrate therein. The polishing apparatus includes an arithmetic unit (308b) operable to calculate a polishing rate and an optimal polishing time based on the polishing rate data and the desired thickness by using a weighted average method which weights the polishing rate data on a lately polished substrate.