Poll-Based Review System for Contextual Feedback Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing review systems are generic and lack context, making it difficult to provide meaningful weight to reviews, and recent feedback often gets lost or is less visible, necessitating a collaborative review system that provides consistent and accurate information prioritizing the most relevant reviews.

Innovation Solution

A collaborative review system utilizing poll-based reviews where users answer ranked questions, allowing for the addition of new questions, and providing tailored suggestions based on user profiles and preferences, ensuring accurate and relevant feedback.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If star ratings and simple approval numbers are used for reviews, then the review system is easy to implement and quick to provide feedback, but the reviews become too generic without context and it is difficult to give meaningful weight to them

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of review submissionVSAvoidcontext information in reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The review system segments feedback into structured poll-based questions with specific categories (e.g., quality, service, value) rather than a single generic star rating. This segmentation allows users to provide targeted feedback on different aspects of the product or service while maintaining ease of use through standardized response options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter structure from simple numerical stars to multi-dimensional poll responses with weighted categories. Each poll question represents a specific parameter aspect, and the aggregation of these parameters creates a nuanced review profile that preserves context while remaining easy to complete.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of information

If unstructured textual feedback is provided with reviews, then context information is preserved, but the feedback becomes time consuming to read and write

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext information in reviewsVSAvoidtime to write and read reviews
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses pre-defined poll question templates that can be quickly selected and answered rather than requiring users to craft original text from scratch. These standardized question objects enable rapid feedback collection while maintaining structured context through categorical organization of responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms open-ended text input into structured parameter-based poll responses. By changing the feedback format from unstructured text to categorized parameters with predefined options, the system reduces the time required to both provide and process reviews while preserving contextual information through the parameter structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If all reviews are displayed equally, then all feedback is visible, but recent feedback is lost or made less visible when more recent feedback is posted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevisibility of review feedbackVSAvoidrelevance of feedback over time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The review display system dynamically prioritizes and weights reviews based on recency, relevance to user preferences, and poll response patterns. More recent feedback receives increased visibility and weight in aggregated scores, while maintaining a structured archive of historical reviews. This dynamic approach ensures timely feedback is prominent without completely obscuring historical context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where poll response patterns and user interactions inform the weighting and display priority of reviews. Recent reviews that align with current user preferences and poll trends are amplified in visibility, creating a feedback-driven display system that adapts to changing relevance over time while preserving access to all historical feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Loss of information

If poll-based review questions are ranked by users in order of importance, then relevant feedback is prioritized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of review feedbackVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Users self-organize poll questions by ranking them in order of importance based on their preferences and needs. This user-driven prioritization system automatically structures the review framework without requiring complex administrative configuration, allowing the system to adapt to diverse user requirements while maintaining relative simplicity through decentralized organization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The poll-based question framework serves multiple functions: it structures review collection, enables user preference expression through ranking, facilitates automated weighting of feedback, and adapts to different product categories. This multi-functional design consolidates what could be multiple separate systems into a unified approach, managing complexity through versatility rather than proliferation of separate mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10133448B2Collaborative peer review system and method of use
Publication Date: 2018.11.20 KUCUKCAKAR KAYHAN
  • US10133448B2 patent drawing
  • US10133448B2 patent drawing
  • US10133448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a system and method for providing poll-based reviews of various businesses and service providers. In particular, a reviewer provides a review by answering poll-based review questions and/or adding new poll-based review questions to provide the most relevant feedback. The review questions can be ranked in order of relevance and/or importance to each reviewer. The data from the review is summarized and presented so that information related to each reviewee is presented in order of preference to the reviewer. Additionally, the present invention gathers data from each reviewer by using polls to tailor suggestions for new reviewees to the reviewer.