Flame-Retardant Polyamide Sheathing for Optical Cables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polyamide sheathings for optical fibers and cables do not adequately meet the requirements for both indoor and outdoor applications, particularly lacking in flame retardancy and flexibility, with previous materials not being halogen-free and not effectively protecting against weather and rodent damage.

Innovation Solution

A flame-retardant polyamide molding compound with a specific composition of 40-71% copolyamide MACMI/12, 20-51% aliphatic polyamide, 6-20% melamine cyanurate, 3-10% aryl phosphate, and 0-6% further additives, which forms one or more layers of the casing, providing a Shore hardness of at least 77 and passing the V2 rating in the 50 W vertical fire test, while allowing for flexibility and rodent resistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional polyamide sheathings are used, then basic protective function is provided, but flame retardancy and halogen-free requirements are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardancyVSAvoidhalogen content
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by incorporating specific flame retardant compounds (melamine cyanurate and aryl phosphate) in defined weight percentages (6-20% and 3-10% respectively) to achieve flame retardancy while maintaining halogen-free status. This parameter modification transforms the material properties to meet both safety requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite molding compound by combining copolyamide MACMI/12 with aliphatic polyamide and integrating flame retardant additives (melamine cyanurate and aryl phosphate) into the polyamide matrix. This composite structure achieves flame retardancy without halogens, resolving the contradiction between reliability and harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If robust protective sheathings are used for outdoor applications, then weather and rodent protection is improved, but flexibility and bendability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverodent and weather resistanceVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the physical parameters of the sheathing by specifying Shore hardness within the range of 77-95 and controlling the composition ratios of copolyamide MACMI/12 (40-71%) and aliphatic polyamide (20-51%). These parameter changes achieve the optimal balance between rodent/weather resistance and flexibility, allowing the material to pass buckling tests while maintaining protective properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite material system combining copolyamide MACMI/12 with aliphatic polyamide to achieve both robustness and flexibility. The specific composition ratio creates a material that is sufficiently hard to resist rodents and weather (Shore hardness ≥77) yet flexible enough to pass buckling tests with metal rods of various diameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Object-affected harmful factors

If high Shore hardness is achieved for rodent resistance, then protective function is improved, but manufacturing complexity and formulation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverodent protectionVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the formulation process by specifying concrete parameter ranges: Shore hardness of 77-95, copolyamide MACMI/12 content of 40-71%, and defined amounts of flame retardants. These parameter specifications provide clear manufacturing targets that achieve rodent protection without requiring complex formulation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP2746340B1Flame-retardant polyamide moulding masses and their applications
Publication Date: 2014.12.24 EMS PATENT AG

AI summary

A flame-retardant polyamide molding compound for encasing optical fibers and optical cables is proposed, comprising: (A) 40 to 71 wt.% copolyamide MACMI/12; (B) 20 to 51 wt.% at least one aliphatic polyamide; (C) 6 to 20 wt.% melamine cyanurate; (D) 3 to 10 wt.% aryl phosphate; and (E) 0 to 6 wt.% other additives; wherein components (A) to (E) supplement 100 wt.% of the polyamide molding compound. The copolyamide MACMI/12 has a laurinlactam content of 23 to 45 mol% based on the molar sum of the monomers MACM, isophthalic acid, and laurinlactam of this copolyamide, wherein the isophthalic acid in the copolyamide MACMI/12 may be wholly or partially replaced by terephthalic acid.A test specimen made from this polyamide molding compound exhibits a Shore hardness D of preferably at least 77, and a bending test is passed with a PA 12 extrudate coated with this molding compound when wound around a metal rod with a diameter of 12 mm, wherein the PA 12 extrudate for this bending test has a diameter of 1.5 mm and a coating thickness of 0.7 mm. Sheathing for optical fibers and optical cables made from this polyamide molding compound exhibits a rodent-resistant effect.