Polyarylene Sulfide Injection Molding with Boron Nucleating Agent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge in injection molding of polyphenylene sulfide (PPS) is its slow crystallization rate, which requires high mold temperatures and long cycle times, making it costly and time-consuming, especially for parts with small dimensional tolerances, and conventional additives have not fully addressed these issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the use of a thermoplastic composition comprising polyarylene sulfide and a boron-containing nucleating agent, which allows for reduced cooling times and lower mold temperatures while maintaining crystallization quality, achieved by controlling the normalized cooling ratio and using less corrosive cooling mediums like liquid water.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional polyphenylene sulfide is used with high mold temperature to achieve desired crystallization, then crystallization quality is improved, but cycle time increases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystallization qualityVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the chemical composition parameter of the polymer by incorporating polyarylene sulfide with specific aromatic ring structures (naphthalene, anthracene, phenanthrene units) to achieve faster crystallization rates without requiring high mold temperatures, thus reducing cycle time while maintaining crystallization quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite material system by combining polyarylene sulfide with specific additives including nucleating agents (0.1-10 wt%), lubricants (0.1-5 wt%), and antioxidants (0.1-5 wt%) to enhance crystallization kinetics and enable shorter cooling cycles while achieving desired mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional polyphenylene sulfide is used with high mold temperature to achieve desired crystallization, then crystallization quality is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystallization qualityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the processing temperature parameter by using polyarylene sulfide compositions that can achieve adequate crystallization at lower mold temperatures (below conventional requirements), eliminating the need for expensive heating mediums like oil and allowing the use of cheaper water-based cooling systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive and corrosive heating mediums (oil) with cheaper and less corrosive alternatives (water-based cooling mediums), reducing both direct material costs and indirect maintenance costs associated with corrosive medium handling and equipment maintenance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Ease of operation

If polyarylene sulfide with good flow properties is used to fill small mold spaces, then flow properties are improved, but cooling cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow propertiesVSAvoidcooling cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the molecular structure parameters of polyarylene sulfide by controlling the content of aromatic rings (6-18 carbon atoms) and sulfide linkages, achieving a balance between melt flow properties and crystallization rate that allows both good mold filling and rapid cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention uses composite material formulations incorporating nucleating agents that promote rapid crystal formation during cooling, compensating for the extended cooling time required by low-viscosity materials and maintaining short overall cycle times while achieving both good flow and fast crystallization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly reduces cooling time and energy requirements, minimizes flash production, and achieves excellent mechanical properties, enabling the production of parts with small dimensional tolerances efficiently and cost-effectively.

Implementation Method 1

the thermoplastic composition comprises a polyarylene sulfide and a boron-containing nucleating agent

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNucleation: Nucleation

Implementation Method 2

subjecting the thermoplastic composition to a cooling cycle to form a molded part

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS8852487B2Injection molding of polyarylene sulfide compositions
Publication Date: 2014.10.07 TICONA LLC
  • US8852487B2 patent drawing
  • US8852487B2 patent drawing
  • US8852487B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for injection molding a thermoplastic composition that contains a polyarylene sulfide and a boron-containing nucleating agent is provided. By selectively controlling certain aspects of the polyarylene sulfide and nucleating agent, as well as the particular manner in which they are combined, the crystallization properties of the resulting thermoplastic composition can be significantly improved. This allows the “cooling time” during a molding cycle to be substantially reduced while still achieving the same degree of crystallization. The cooling time can be represented by the “normalized cooling ratio”, which is determined by dividing the total cooling time by the average thickness of the molded part.