Polyaspartic Ester Synthesis via Segmented Reaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing production methods for polyaspartic esters are hampered by the slow conversion of starting materials to near quantitative levels, leading to long waiting times for product availability and health risks due to irritant chemicals, and result in polyurea coatings with reduced working time and potential premature gelation.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the reaction of fumaric or maleic acid esters with polyamines, followed by completion with cyanoacetate, malononitrile, or 1,3-diketones in the presence of a base to produce polyaspartic esters without residual esters, facilitating the production of polyurea coatings that are safer and more environmentally friendly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If polyaspartic esters are prepared by reacting polyamines with dialkyl esters of maleic or fumaric acid, then polyaspartic esters can be produced, but the conversion of starting materials is slow and takes several weeks to months to achieve near quantitative conversion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion completenessVSAvoidproduction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the single-step ester reaction into two distinct steps: first reacting polyamine with maleic ester to form polyaspartic ester, then separately reacting with fumaric ester. This segmentation allows each step to proceed optimally and prevents the slow conversion issue by controlling the reaction sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary removal of excess starting materials through distillation before the main reaction proceeds. This preliminary action prevents the slow conversion problem by eliminating unreacted materials that would otherwise remain and require extended reaction times.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If excess starting materials are present after polyaspartic ester production, then the reaction can be simplified, but distillation is required to remove them which is expensive and laborious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction simplicityVSAvoidpurification process
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes excess starting materials through distillation before the main reaction. This extraction step eliminates the need for complex purification processes later, as the excess materials are removed early when they are still separable by distillation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters by using a two-step process with controlled conditions. The first step uses specific temperature and time parameters to form polyaspartic ester, then the second step uses different parameters to react with fumaric ester, optimizing the overall process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If diethyl fumarate is used as starting material, then polyaspartic ester can be produced, but it is an irritant and affects worker health

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct purityVSAvoidworker health safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful fumaric ester into a beneficial process by using it as a controlled reactant in the second step. The fumaric ester is reacted completely in the second step under controlled conditions, transforming it from a harmful intermediate into a useful component of the final polyaspartic ester product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a two-step reaction process where the first step creates an intermediate polyaspartic ester, then the second step introduces fumaric ester as a controlled intermediate reactant. This intermediary approach allows complete conversion and minimizes the presence of harmful fumaric ester in the final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If polyaspartic ester is used in commerce, then coatings can be produced, but customers must wait a very long time between manufacture and receipt

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct qualityVSAvoiddelivery time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the production process into two rapid steps instead of one long reaction. The first step forms polyaspartic ester quickly, then the second step completes the reaction with fumaric ester. This segmentation reduces total production time while maintaining product quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent maintains continuous useful action by immediately following the first reaction with the second reaction. There is no idle time between steps, and the process flows continuously from polyamine reaction to fumaric ester reaction, eliminating delays and reducing overall production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

5Ease of manufacture

If polyaspartic ester mixtures are produced, then the reaction process is simplified, but the working time or pot life is reduced causing premature gelation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidpot life
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes excess starting materials through distillation before the main reaction. This extraction prevents the formation of mixtures with unreacted materials that would cause premature gelation, while still maintaining production efficiency through the two-step process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the reaction parameters by using controlled two-step reactions with specific conditions. The first step uses optimized parameters to form polyaspartic ester, then the second step uses different parameters to complete the reaction, controlling the overall process to prevent premature gelation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the timely and efficient production of polyaspartic esters, reducing waiting times and health risks, while maintaining the cured properties of polyurea coatings and preventing premature gelation, thus enhancing their application and safety.

Implementation Method 1

a polyaspartic acid ester... and a 2-substituted butanedioic acid ester prepared by reacting the fumaric ester in the polyaspartic acid ester solution with a cyanoacetate, a malononitrile or a 1,3-diketone in the presence of a base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

reacting the fumaric ester in the polyaspartic acid ester solution with a cyanoacetate, a malononitrile or a 1,3-diketone in the presence of a base

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Data Source

PatentUS20240376343A1Polyurea compositions from polyaspartic esters and 2-substituted butanedioic acid esters
Publication Date: 2024.11.14 EVONIK OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US20240376343A1 patent drawing
  • US20240376343A1 patent drawing
  • US20240376343A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a polyurea coating composition comprising (A) a polyisocyanate: (B) a polyaspartic ester; and (C) a 2-substituted butanedioic acid ester prepared by reacting the fumaric ester in the polyaspartic acid ester solution with a cyanoacetate, a malononitrile or a 1,3-diketone in the presence of a base.