Flame Retardant Polycarbonate Composition with ABS and Phosphorus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need for impact-modified thermoplastic polycarbonate compositions that maintain high impact strength and flame performance, particularly in thin samples, while avoiding the adverse effects of brominated and chlorinated flame retardants and rubbery impact modifiers, which can degrade thermal aging stability and processability.

Innovation Solution

A thermoplastic composition comprising a polycarbonate component, a bulk polymerized ABS impact modifier, and a flame retardant, along with an ungrafted rigid copolymer, which includes an elastomeric phase and a rigid copolymer phase derived from specific monomers, achieving a balance of high flow and physical properties without significant degradation of impact strength or flame performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If brominated or chlorinated flame retardant agents are used, then flame retardancy is achieved, but equipment corrosion and regulatory restrictions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflame retardancyVSAvoidequipment corrosion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effects of halogenated flame retardants (corrosion, regulatory issues) into beneficial non-halogenated alternatives. Specifically, it uses phosphorus-containing compounds and polysiloxane-polycarbonate copolymers that provide equivalent flame retardancy without generating corrosive by-products, thereby eliminating the harmful factors while maintaining the protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters of the flame retardant system by transitioning from halogenated compounds to non-halogenated phosphorus-containing compounds and polysiloxane copolymers. This parameter change maintains flame retardancy (UL94 V0 rating) while eliminating corrosion and regulatory problems associated with bromine and chlorine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If nonhalogenated flame retardants are used, then equipment corrosion is avoided, but strict flame retardancy standards cannot be met in thin samples

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment corrosionVSAvoidflame retardancy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple non-halogenated flame retardant systems (phosphorus-containing compounds combined with polysiloxane-polycarbonate copolymers) to achieve synergistic effects. This combination allows the composition to meet strict flame retardancy standards (UL94 V0) in thin samples while maintaining zero corrosion, overcoming the limitations of single non-halogenated flame retardant systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite material system combining polycarbonate base resin with phosphorus-containing flame retardants and polysiloxane copolymer impact modifiers. This composite structure achieves both high flame retardancy and zero corrosion, resolving the contradiction between non-halogenated safety and performance requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If polysiloxane-modified polycarbonates are used as impact modifiers, then impact strength is improved, but burn-through holes form more quickly in thin articles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact strengthVSAvoidburn-through holes
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by using polysiloxane copolymer units with specific structural characteristics (siloxane segments comprising 1 to 20 polysiloxane units) that provide impact modification only where needed while maintaining flame resistance in critical thin sections. The controlled structure ensures improved toughness without excessive burn-through susceptibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If rubbery impact modifiers are added to aromatic polycarbonates, then toughness is improved, but thermal aging stability and processability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetoughnessVSAvoidthermal aging stability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the molecular structure parameters of impact modifiers by using polysiloxane copolymers with controlled siloxane unit counts (1 to 20 units) and specific glass transition temperatures. This parameter control provides the necessary toughness while maintaining thermal aging stability and processability, avoiding the degradation associated with conventional rubbery modifiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7649051B2Flame retardant thermoplastic polycarbonate compositions
Publication Date: 2010.01.19 SABIC GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES BV
  • US7649051B2 patent drawing
  • US7649051B2 patent drawing
  • US7649051B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A flame retardant thermoplastic composition comprising in combination a polycarbonate component; an impact modifier composition, the components of the impact modifier composition comprising a) a bulk polymerized ABS, and b) an impact modifier different from the ABS; an ungrafted rigid copolymer; and a flame retardant. The compositions have an improved balance of physical properties such as impact strength and flow, while at the same time maintaining their good flame performance.