Resilient Orthodontic Aligners via Polycarbonate Diol Resin

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing printable/polymerizable resins used in 3D printing are too brittle for resilient oral appliances like aligners, prone to breaking in the mouth, which can lead to material fragments abrading or puncturing tissue or being swallowed, disrupting treatment and potentially causing serious health consequences.

Innovation Solution

A polymerizable composition comprising 30-65 parts by weight of monofunctional (meth)acrylate monomer(s) with a cured homopolymer glass transition temperature (Tg) of 30°C or greater, and at least one urethane (meth)acrylate with polymerized units of an aliphatic polycarbonate diol, optimized for use in vat polymerization 3D printing to create resilient orthodontic articles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If existing printable/polymerizable resins are used in 3D printing, then the articles can be manufactured, but the articles are too brittle and prone to breaking

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovebrittlenessVSAvoidbreakage resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the chemical composition parameters of the resin by incorporating specific monofunctional (meth)acrylate monomers with Tg of 30°C or greater and urethane (meth)acrylates with aliphatic polycarbonate diol units. This changes the material properties to achieve both manufacturability and breakage resistance required for orthodontic appliances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite resin system combining multiple components: monofunctional (meth)acrylate monomers, urethane (meth)acrylates containing aliphatic polycarbonate diol polymerized units, and other compatible monomers. This composite approach achieves the desired balance of brittleness and reliability that single materials cannot provide

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If resilient orthodontic articles are created, then breakage is reduced, but the composition must be precisely tailored for 3D printing compatibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebreakage resistanceVSAvoidcomposition tailoring complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges for the resin composition: 30-65 parts by weight of monofunctional (meth)acrylate monomer with Tg ≥30°C, and specific amounts of urethane (meth)acrylate with aliphatic polycarbonate diol. These defined parameters simplify manufacturing by providing clear formulation guidelines while achieving the required reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent assigns different functional roles to specific components: monofunctional (meth)acrylate monomers provide structural integrity with appropriate Tg, while urethane (meth)acrylates with aliphatic polycarbonate diol provide flexibility and toughness. This functional differentiation enables precise control over material properties for 3D printing applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If the resin composition is optimized for vat polymerization 3D printing, then articles with proper mechanical properties are produced, but viscosity must be carefully controlled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertiesVSAvoidviscosity control
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent selects monomers and oligomers with appropriate molecular weights and functional groups that provide the necessary mechanical properties while maintaining viscosity within the 50-500 cP range required for vat polymerization 3D printing processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures the resin composition is homogeneous and free from fillers, pigments, or other additives that could affect viscosity or curing uniformity. This homogeneity enables consistent flow characteristics and reliable 3D printing performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting orthodontic articles exhibit low brittleness, good resistance to water, and high toughness, minimizing the risk of breakage and ensuring safe and uninterrupted treatment.

Implementation Method 1

The use of stereolithography and inkjet printing to produce three-dimensional articles has been known for a relatively long time, and these processes are generally known as methods of so called 3D printing (or additive manufacturing). In vat polymerization techniques (of which stereolithography is one type), the desired 3D article is built up from a liquid, curable composition with the aid of a recurring, alternating sequence of two steps: in the first step, a layer of the liquid, curable composition, one boundary of which is the surface of the composition, is cured with the aid of appropriate radiation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotopolymerization: Photopolymerisation

Data Source

PatentUS12297316B2Orthodontic articles prepared using a polycarbonate diol, polymerizable compositions, and methods of making the articles
Publication Date: 2025.05.13 SOLVENTUM INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES CO
  • US12297316B2 patent drawing
  • US12297316B2 patent drawing
  • US12297316B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides an orthodontic article including the reaction product of the polymerizable composition. Further, the present disclosure provides polymerizable compositions and methods of making an orthodontic article. The method includes obtaining a polymerizable composition and selectively curing the polymerizable composition to form an orthodontic article. Further, methods are provided, including receiving, by a manufacturing device having one or more processors, a digital object comprising data specifying an orthodontic article; and generating, with the manufacturing device by an additive manufacturing process, the orthodontic article based on the digital object. A system is also provided, including a display that displays a 3D model of an orthodontic article; and one or more processors that, in response to the 3D model selected by a user, cause a 3D printer to create a physical object of an orthodontic article.