Transparent Polycarbonate Flame Retardant Mixture

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Polycarbonate specimens thinner than 1.6 mm struggle to achieve UL 94 V-0 flammability rating without compromising transparency, as existing flame retardants require higher loadings that do not adequately meet the V-0 classification for 0.8-0.4 mm thicknesses.

Innovation Solution

A mixture of aryl phosphate ester of hydroquinone bis(diphenyl phosphate) and tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine, with a weight ratio of 1:3 to 1:5, is added to polycarbonate resin, achieving UL 94 V-0 rating across the entire thickness range while maintaining optical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If higher loadings of flame retardant are used to achieve V-0 rating for thin specimens, then flammability resistance is improved, but transparency is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflammability resistanceVSAvoidtransparency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSIllumination intensity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite flame retardant system combining aryl phosphate ester (acting as a core flame retardant) with auxiliary additives (KSS and/or PMS). This composite approach allows achieving V-0 rating at lower total concentrations (1.0-5.0 wt%) compared to using single additives, thereby maintaining transparency while improving flammability resistance. The synergistic effect of the composite system enables effective flame retardancy at thin specimen thicknesses (0.4-0.8 mm) without requiring excessive additive loadings that would compromise optical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes the concentration parameters of the flame retardant system, specifically maintaining aryl phosphate ester at 0.1-2.0 wt% and auxiliary additives at 0.5-3.0 wt%. By carefully controlling these parameter ranges, the formulation achieves V-0 flammability rating for specimens as thin as 0.4 mm while preserving transparency. The parameter optimization prevents the transparency degradation that occurs with higher additive loadings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional flame retardants are used for thin polycarbonate specimens, then flammability resistance is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases due to multiple additive combinations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflammability resistanceVSAvoidadditive formulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite flame retardant system where aryl phosphate ester serves as the primary flame retardant and KSS/PMS act as auxiliary additives. This composite formulation achieves synergistic flame retardancy, allowing the system to meet V-0 requirements for thin specimens (0.4-0.8 mm) more effectively than single additives, while maintaining a relatively simple three-component maximum formulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different additive strategies based on the specific application requirements. For basic applications, a simple aryl phosphate ester formulation suffices. For enhanced performance or specific processing conditions, auxiliary additives (KSS, PMS) can be selectively incorporated. This localized quality approach allows manufacturers to optimize the formulation complexity according to the specific flammability and processing requirements, avoiding unnecessary complexity in applications where it is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The additive mixture effectively reduces flammability and maintains transparency, achieving UL 94 V-0 classification for specimens as thin as 0.4 mm, with a concentration of 10-20% by weight, ensuring compliance with stringent flammability standards without adverse effects on optical properties.

Implementation Method 1

a mixture consisting of: (i) aryl phosphate ester of hydroquinone (1,4-dihydroxybenzene) of Formula (I)... and (ii) tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine of Formula (II)... can be added to a polycarbonate resin to produce products displaying high level of flame retardancy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlame retardancy:

Data Source

PatentUS10934489B2Flame-retarded transparent polycarbonate compositions
Publication Date: 2021.03.02 BROMINE COMPOUNDS
  • US10934489B2 patent drawing
  • US10934489B2 patent drawing
  • US10934489B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transparent composition comprising polycarbonate and a mixture of flame retardants, wherein the flame retardants are aryl phosphate ester of hydroquinone and tris(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)-s-triazine.