Polyclonal and Anti-PD1 Antibody Combination for Cold Tumors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cancer treatments using monoclonal antibodies are ineffective against 'cold tumors' and face resistance due to immunoselection and immunosubversion mechanisms, while polyclonal antibodies are toxic and inefficient due to cross-reactivity and antigenic determinants like Neu5Gc and α-1,3-galactose.

Innovation Solution

An association of non-human mammal polyclonal antibodies, devoid of Neu5Gc and α-1,3-galactose antigenic determinants, with monoclonal anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 antibodies, specifically targeting cancer cells, to enhance immune response and reduce toxicity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If polyclonal antibodies are used to target different epitopes on tumoral cells, then resistance to immunoselection and immunosubversion mechanisms is minimized, but toxicity increases due to cross-reactivity with non-cancerous cells and antigenic determinants like Neu5Gc and α-1,3-galactose

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment efficacyVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention segments the antibody population into two distinct functional groups: polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) that provide broad epitope coverage and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) that provide specific checkpoint blocking. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specialized function without the harmful effects of using pAbs alone - the mAbs component specifically blocks PD-1/PD-L1 interactions without causing cross-reactivity toxicity, while the pAbs component provides broad coverage without requiring high doses that would cause toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces monoclonal anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies as an intermediary substance that mediates the interaction between the polyclonal antibody mixture and the tumor. The mAbs act as a selective filter that enhances the anti-tumor effect of the pAbs by specifically blocking immune checkpoint pathways, while the combination formulation ensures that the pAbs are not diluted or rendered ineffective by the mAbs, maintaining both efficacy and reduced toxicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If monoclonal antibodies are used to treat cancer, then treatment specificity is improved, but resistance through immunoselection and immunosubversion mechanisms increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment specificityVSAvoidtreatment efficacy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the antibody therapy into two segments: monoclonal antibodies for specific checkpoint blocking and polyclonal antibodies for broad epitope coverage. The mAbs segment provides precise targeting of PD-1/PD-L1 interactions, while the pAbs segment compensates for resistance mechanisms by targeting multiple different epitopes on tumor cells simultaneously, preventing immunoselection and immunosubversion that would occur with mAbs alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention creates a composite antibody formulation combining both monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies. This composite approach leverages the advantages of both types: the mAbs provide specific checkpoint inhibition with high precision, while the pAbs provide broad spectral coverage that prevents tumor escape mechanisms. The synergistic combination achieves both specificity and reliability that neither component could achieve alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If polyclonal antibodies are administered at higher doses to compensate for binding to non-target sites, then coverage of tumor targets is improved, but toxicity is aggravated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetumor target coverageVSAvoidtoxicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The monoclonal anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies serve as an intermediary that enhances the effectiveness of the polyclonal antibodies at lower doses. By blocking immune checkpoint pathways, the mAbs create a more favorable immunological environment that amplifies the anti-tumor effect of the pAbs, reducing the dose required and thereby minimizing toxicity while maintaining adequate tumor coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The composite formulation of mAbs and pAbs allows the pAbs to be administered at lower, more tolerable doses because the mAbs component provides a significant portion of the anti-tumor effect through specific checkpoint blocking. This composite approach eliminates the need to administer high doses of pAbs alone to achieve sufficient tumor coverage, thereby reducing toxicity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The combination achieves high efficiency against targeted tumors with minimal toxicity, converting 'cold tumors' into 'hot tumors' by increasing immune cell infiltration, particularly T cells, and improving treatment efficacy.

Implementation Method 1

by cytotoxicity complement dependent (CDC) or dependent from killer cells (ADCC) or dependent from phagocytes (ADCP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComplement-dependent cytotoxicity:

Implementation Method 2

by cytotoxicity complement dependent (CDC) or dependent from killer cells (ADCC) or dependent from phagocytes (ADCP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAntibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity:

Implementation Method 3

by cytotoxicity complement dependent (CDC) or dependent from killer cells (ADCC) or dependent from phagocytes (ADCP)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhagocytosis:

Implementation Method 4

opsonization of a target and the local production of complement's molecules (C3a, C5a) activates the T lymphocyte co-stimulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOpsonization:

Implementation Method 5

the local production of complement's molecules (C3a, C5a) activates the T lymphocyte co-stimulation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectComplement activation:

Data Source

PatentUS12540184B2Association of polyclonal antibodies and anti-PD1 or anti-PDL1 antibodies for the treatment of cancer
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 XENOTHERA
  • US12540184B2 patent drawing
  • US12540184B2 patent drawing
  • US12540184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an association of non-human mammal polyclonal antibodies directed against cancer cells; and at least one monoclonal antibody selected from the group consisting of anti-PD1 and anti-PDL1 monoclonal antibodies for its use for preventing and/or treating a cancer in a mammal patient. The association as such is also considered.