Polyester Composition Low Temperature Impact Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Photovoltaic junction boxes require materials with low temperature impact resistance to withstand extreme temperatures without structural damage, which existing polyester compositions fail to provide effectively.

Innovation Solution

Compositions comprising 30-65 weight percent polyester, 7-25 weight percent ethylene copolymer toughener, 5-25 weight percent copolyether ester elastomer with shore D hardness between 20-50, and optionally a flame retardant, achieving a Gardner impact of at least 4.2 J at -40°C, optimized by specific weight ratios and the inclusion of halogenated epoxy flame retardants for enhanced impact strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If existing polyester compositions are used, then the material is simple and easy to manufacture, but the low temperature impact resistance is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelow temperature impact resistanceVSAvoidcomposition complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining polyester with two specific elastomeric components (ethylene copolymer and copolyether ester) in defined weight ratios. This multi-material composition resolves the contradiction by achieving superior low temperature impact resistance (Gardner impact ≥4.2 J at -40°C) through the synergistic effect of the composite, while the ratios are optimized to maintain manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling the weight percentages of each component (polyester: 30-65%, ethylene copolymer: 7-25%, copolyether ester: 5-25%) and the ratio between toughening components (0.3-2.5). These parameter optimizations enable the composition to achieve the required Gardner impact of at least 4.2 J at -40°C while maintaining practical manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If more elastomeric components are added to improve impact resistance, then the impact strength increases, but the manufacturing cost and process complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the weight ratios of elastomeric components to achieve the minimum required Gardner impact of 4.2 J at -40°C. By setting specific ranges (ethylene copolymer: 7-25%, copolyether ester: 5-25%) and their ratio to each other (0.3-2.5), the formulation achieves adequate impact strength without excessive addition of expensive elastomers, balancing performance with manufacturing economy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The use of a composite system with two complementary elastomeric components allows each to contribute differently to impact resistance. The ethylene copolymer provides baseline toughness while the copolyether ester enhances low-temperature performance, achieving the required 4.2 J Gardner impact at optimized loadings that balance cost and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Strength

If the composition is optimized for maximum impact resistance, then the Gardner impact increases, but the formulation complexity and component selection difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveGardner impactVSAvoidformulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes specific parameter ranges and ratios to achieve maximum Gardner impact while controlling formulation complexity. The weight percent ranges (polyester: 30-65%, ethylene copolymer: 7-25%, copolyether ester: 5-25%) and the inter-component ratio (0.3-2.5) provide clear formulation guidelines that lead to optimized impact performance without requiring overly complex formulation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8754171B2Polyester composition
Publication Date: 2014.06.17 CELANESE POLYMERS HLDG INC
  • US8754171B2 patent drawing
  • US8754171B2 patent drawing
  • US8754171B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compositions comprising: (a) 30 to 65 weight percent of a polyester;(b) 7 to 25 weight percent of an ethylene copolymer toughener; (c) 5 to 25 weight percent of a copolyether ester elastomer having a shore D hardness of 20 to 50; optionally (d) 15 to 35 weight percent of a halogenated epoxy flame retardant; and (e) when (d) is present in the composition, optionally, 2 to 10 weight percent of a flame retardant synergist;wherein: the ratio of the combined weight of (b)+(c) relative to the weight of (a) ranges from 0.40 to 0.85; the ratio of the weight of (b) relative to that of (c) ranges from 0.3 to 2.5; and the Gardner impact of the composition, when molded, is at least 4.2 J, measured at −40° C. according to ASTM D5420. Methods of making articles by molding these melt-mixed compositions.