Polyether Polyol Water Removal via Controlled Distillation Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing processes for removing water from polyether polyols during batch distillation often result in foam overflow, leading to wastewater contamination and reduced productivity, especially when dealing with higher molecular weight polyols, as the reaction of water with alkaline catalysts is undesirable and can cause foaming issues during distillation.

Innovation Solution

A controlled batch distillation process where the polyether polyol is heated within specific temperature ranges while maintaining pressures above normal atmospheric pressure, with controlled pressure increase and decrease rates to manage the removal of water, reducing foam formation and allowing for larger batch sizes by minimizing foam overflow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If batch distillation is used to remove water from polyether polyol, then water removal efficiency is improved, but foam overflow occurs leading to productivity reduction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater removal efficiencyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling pressure and temperature parameters during batch distillation. The pressure is controlled to increase at a rate of 0.01 to 1 psi/sec and decrease at 0.001 to 0.1 psi/sec, while temperature is maintained within specific ranges (100-140°C for atmospheric distillation, 110-150°C for vacuum distillation). These parameter optimizations enable effective water removal while preventing foam overflow, thus resolving the contradiction between water removal efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If batch size is increased to utilize more reactor capacity, then productivity is improved, but foam overflow frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor capacity utilizationVSAvoidfoam overflow frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by implementing dynamic control of pressure during the distillation process. The pressure is not held constant but is actively adjusted at controlled rates (increase: 0.01 to 1 psi/sec, decrease: 0.001 to 0.1 psi/sec) based on process conditions. This dynamic pressure control adapts to the foaming behavior during distillation, enabling larger batch sizes to be processed without foam overflow, thus resolving the contradiction between productivity and foam overflow frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If pressure is maintained at atmospheric pressure during distillation, then equipment complexity is reduced, but foam formation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment complexityVSAvoidfoam formation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic action by alternating between atmospheric pressure distillation and vacuum pressure distillation in a controlled sequence. The process first conducts atmospheric distillation with controlled pressure increase, then transitions to vacuum distillation with controlled pressure decrease. This periodic pressure variation effectively manages foam formation at different stages, resolving the contradiction between equipment complexity and foam formation without requiring complex continuous vacuum equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively reduces the frequency of foam overflow, enabling increased reactor capacity utilization by maintaining controlled pressure and temperature conditions during distillation, resulting in a more efficient and productive water removal process from polyether polyols.

Implementation Method 1

heating the polyether polyol to a temperature within a first predetermined distillation temperature range... to remove a first portion of the water from the polyether polyol

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDistillation: Distillation

Implementation Method 2

heating the polyether polyol to a temperature within a first predetermined distillation temperature range... to remove a first portion of the water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEvaporation: Evaporation

Implementation Method 3

controlling the rate of increase in vessel pressure within a predetermined pressure increase rate range... and controlling the rate of decrease in vessel pressure within a predetermined pressure decrease rate range

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure control:

Data Source

PatentEP3475337B1Processes for removing water from a polyether polyol
Publication Date: 2022.06.01 COVESTRO LLC
  • EP3475337B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3475337B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3475337B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Disclosed are processes and systems for removing water from a polyether polyol that employs a controlled temperature and pressure profile.