Polyethylene Yarn Melt Spinning for High Dimensional Stability

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polyethylene yarn manufacturing methods, such as gel spinning for UHMWPE and two-step melt spinning for HMWPE, face environmental and cost issues, low tenacity, and inadequate dimensional stability, while also reducing productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method involving melt spinning with a polyethylene blend containing a fluorine-based polymer, followed by multi-stage drawing using godet rollers, ensures high tenacity and dimensional stability by preventing filament breakage and optimizing molecular weight, polydispersity, and drawing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If gel spinning method is used to manufacture UHMWPE yarn, then high tenacity is achieved, but environmental problems and high cost occur due to organic solvent usage

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the molecular weight parameter from UHMWPE (>600,000 g/mol) to HMWPE (20,000-600,000 g/mol), which fundamentally alters the spinning behavior from requiring gel spinning to enabling melt spinning. This parameter change eliminates organic solvent usage while maintaining high tenacity through optimized draw ratio and molecular weight control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical-based gel spinning system with a thermal-based melt spinning system. By substituting the spinning mechanism from solvent-gel formation to melt extrusion, the harmful organic solvent is eliminated while the desired high tenacity is achieved through thermal processing parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Strength

If two-step method is used to improve tenacity of melt-spun HMWPE yarn, then tenacity increases to 13 g/d or more, but productivity decreases and manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the spinning and drawing operations into a single continuous process. By combining what were previously separate steps (spinning to undrawn yarn, then separate drawing to high tenacity) into one integrated melt spinning process with optimized parameters, productivity increases while maintaining high tenacity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes multiple parameters simultaneously: molecular weight (20,000-600,000 g/mol), draw ratio (1.5-10 times), and crystallization temperature (40-100°C). This multi-parameter optimization enables achieving high tenacity in a single spinning step rather than requiring the two-step process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If two-step method is used to manufacture high tenacity polyethylene yarn, then tenacity improves, but dimensional stability becomes insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The invention optimizes the draw ratio parameter within a specific range (1.5-10 times) and controls crystallization temperature (40-100°C) to simultaneously achieve high tenacity and excellent dimensional stability. The controlled crystallization process creates a stable crystal structure that prevents thermal shrinkage while maintaining strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements feedback control by monitoring and adjusting drawing conditions and crystallization parameters to achieve the optimal balance between tenacity and dimensional stability. The process parameters are optimized based on the interrelationship between molecular weight, draw ratio, and thermal properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method produces a polyethylene yarn with high tenacity of 12 g/d or more and low thermal shrinkage stress of 0.325 g/d or less, enhancing productivity and stability.

Implementation Method 1

a preparation step of providing a melt for spinning containing a polyethylene having a weight average molecular weight (Mw) of 50,000 to 600,000 g/mol; a spinning step of obtaining filaments by extruding the melt through a spinneret

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelt spinning:

Implementation Method 2

a quenching step of quenching the filaments

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectQuenching: Cooling

Implementation Method 3

a drawing step of multi-stage drawing a multifilament composed of the quenched filaments at a total draw ratio of 11 to 23 times using a multi-stage drawing zone including a plurality of godet rollers set at a temperature of 40 to 140 °C

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat treatment: Heating

Implementation Method 4

a drawing step of multi-stage drawing a multifilament composed of the quenched filaments at a total draw ratio of 11 to 23 times

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrawing: Deformation

Data Source

PatentEP4023798B1Polyethylene yarn of high tenacity having high dimensional stability and method for manufacturing same
Publication Date: 2025.10.08
  • EP4023798B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4023798B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4023798B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a polyethylene yarn and a method for manufacturing the same. In the present disclosure, there are provided a polyethylene yarn having excellent dimensional stability and high tenacity, and a method for manufacturing the above polyethylene yarn more efficiently.