Polygon-Scanner LiDAR Facets for Long-Range Range and Velocity Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional LIDAR systems face limitations in accurately determining range and velocity of objects, especially at long distances and in environments with varying reflectivity, due to limited field of view and interference issues, which can impact the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicle operations.

Innovation Solution

A LIDAR system utilizing a polygon scanner with irregular facets of varying lengths and angles, providing different fields of view, enhances sampling density and signal-to-noise ratio, allowing for improved detection of range, velocity, and Doppler shift information, and is designed for long-range applications such as autonomous trucking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional LIDAR systems use uniform polygon scanner facets, then the system structure is simple, but the field of view coverage and sampling density are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverange and velocity determination accuracyVSAvoidpolygon scanner facet configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The polygon scanner is divided into multiple facets with different geometric parameters. Each facet is segmented to have specific angles and lengths that create varying field of view angles, allowing different regions of the scan to be sampled at different densities appropriate for their importance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different facets are assigned different local qualities in terms of their geometric properties. Facets closer to the center of the scan pattern have different characteristics than those at the periphery, creating locally optimized sampling density where higher density is applied to critical regions and lower density to less critical regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Area of stationary object

If LIDAR systems increase field of view angle, then the coverage area increases, but the sampling density decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefield of view coverage areaVSAvoidsampling density
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts sampling density across different field of view angles by using facets with varying geometric properties. The sampling density is not uniform but dynamically optimized based on the angular position, with closer facets providing higher density and farther facets providing broader coverage at reduced density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The solution adds a dimensional aspect to the facet configuration by varying both the angular position and the radial distance of facets from the rotation axis. This creates a two-dimensional optimization space where sampling density and coverage area can be independently controlled across different angular sectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Length of stationary object

If LIDAR systems use larger beam sizes, then the detection range increases, but the range resolution decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidrange resolution
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The beam scanning process is segmented into multiple passes, each handled by different facets. This allows the system to use larger beam sizes for long-range detection while maintaining fine range resolution through the segmented sampling approach, as each facet contributes to resolving different portions of the range profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial sampling at high density for critical regions and excessive sampling at lower density for less critical regions. This allows the use of larger beam sizes overall while maintaining sufficient resolution in key areas through targeted high-density sampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves enhanced accuracy in determining range and velocity, enabling safer and more efficient autonomous vehicle operations by increasing the maximum design range and reducing interference, thus improving safety and performance in diverse environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

Each facet of the plurality of facets is configured to transmit a second beam responsive to the first beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

determine at least one of a range to or a velocity of an object using a return beam received responsive to the transmit beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Implementation Method 3

determine at least one of a range to or a velocity of an object using a return beam received responsive to the transmit beam, and control operation of an autonomous vehicle responsive to the at least one of the range or the velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDoppler effect: Doppler Effect

Data Source

PatentUS11181642B1Lidar system
Publication Date: 2021.11.23 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US11181642B1 patent drawing
  • US11181642B1 patent drawing
  • US11181642B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A LIDAR system includes a laser source configured to output a first beam and a polygon scanner. The polygon scanner includes a plurality of facets. Each facet of the plurality of facets is configured to transmit a second beam responsive to the first beam. The plurality of facets include a first facet having a first field of view over which the first facet transmits the second beam and a second facet having a second field of view over which the second facet transmits the second beam. The first field of view is greater than the second field of view.