Polygon Mirror Mark Detection for Accurate Laser Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image forming apparatuses face issues with fluctuating reflection surface lengths in polygon mirrors, leading to incorrect identification of scanning periods and errors in detecting marks due to operational conditions and external contaminants, affecting the accuracy of light beam scanning.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus incorporates a mark detector and an actuator to move the detector to a position corresponding to the operation condition of the exposure device, using a controller to adjust the detection timing of marks on the polygon mirror, and employs a nonvolatile storage device for individual control of exposure devices to compensate for changes in operational characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a reflective-type optical sensor is used to detect a mark on the motor axis, then the detection of reflection surfaces can be automated, but wrong reflection surfaces are detected due to waveform variations caused by operational conditions and overlapping detection timings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic reflection surface identificationVSAvoidmark detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the optical sensor movable along the rotation direction of the polygon mirror. The sensor position is dynamically adjusted based on detected waveform characteristics - when mark detection accuracy deteriorates due to waveform variations from operational conditions, the sensor moves to optimize detection timing and prevent overlapping with light beam detection signals, thereby maintaining high measurement precision while preserving automated operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the waveform of the sensor signal and using this information to control the position of the optical sensor. The detection timing of the mark is adjusted based on waveform analysis, and when accuracy deterioration is detected, the sensor position is automatically corrected. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures accurate reflection surface identification despite variations in operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the mark detector position is fixed, then the device structure is simplified, but detection accuracy deteriorates under varying operational conditions and rotation speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetector positioning mechanismVSAvoidmark detection timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the fixed detector position into a dynamic, adjustable position. The optical sensor can move along the rotation direction of the polygon mirror, allowing the detection timing to be optimized for different operational conditions and rotation speeds. This dynamic positioning capability maintains high detection accuracy across varying operating parameters without significantly complicating the overall device structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the positional parameter of the optical sensor based on operational conditions. By adjusting the sensor position along the rotation direction according to detected waveform characteristics and operational parameters, the system adapts to varying rotation speeds and conditions, maintaining optimal detection accuracy without requiring a completely complex reconfiguration mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures accurate identification of reflection surfaces, reducing errors in scanning and enhancing the precision of image formation by compensating for operational and environmental variations.

Implementation Method 1

a mark detector that detects a mark attached to a motor axis of the polygon motor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12585210B2Image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 KYOCERA DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS INC
  • US12585210B2 patent drawing
  • US12585210B2 patent drawing
  • US12585210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus includes a photoconductor drum, an exposure device, a development device, and a controller. The exposure device irradiates the photoconductor drum with a light beam and thereby forms an electrostatic latent image. The development device causes toner to adhere to the electrostatic latent image and thereby generates a toner image. The controller controls the exposure device. Further the exposure device includes a polygon mirror, a polygon motor, a mark detector, and an actuator. The polygon mirror is configured to scan the light beam. The polygon motor is configured to rotate the polygon mirror. The mark detector is configured to detect a mark attached to a motor axis of the polygon motor. The actuator is configured to be enabled to move the mark detector. Furthermore, the controller moves the mark detector to a position corresponding to an operation condition of the exposure device using the actuator.