Polygon-Overlap Pipeline Grouping for Reproducible Network Construction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for grouping pipelines in pipe networks, such as replacing high-priority pipelines, are inefficient, complex, and lack reproducibility, especially when pipelines are scattered, and manual grouping by workers is difficult to evaluate and unsuitable for large-scale networks.

Innovation Solution

A pipeline grouping apparatus and method that automatically groups pipelines based on indicators like total pipeline length, installation cost, elevation difference, or residual chlorine level, using a controller to set base points, generate polygons, calculate overlapping areas, and regroup if necessary to optimize construction efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual grouping operation is performed by workers based on experience, then grouping results can be obtained, but the operation is very complicated, requires a certain amount of time and effort, and lacks reproducibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping operationVSAvoidtime and effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical grouping operation with an automated computer-based system. The controller automatically groups pipelines based on predetermined conditions (such as pipeline attributes, spatial relationships, and hydraulic characteristics) without requiring worker intervention, thereby eliminating the time and effort previously spent on manual grouping operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automation where the pipeline grouping is performed automatically by the controller based on pre-set criteria. The system serves itself by using its own computational resources and algorithms to perform the grouping task without external human input, achieving both time savings and reproducibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If manual grouping operation is performed by workers, then grouping results can be obtained, but the results lack reproducibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrouping operationVSAvoidreproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the grouping process from a subjective human decision-making process to an objective parameter-based automated process. By defining specific parameters (pipeline attributes, spatial coordinates, hydraulic parameters) and predetermined conditions, the system ensures that the same input always produces the same grouping result, achieving complete reproducibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The automated controller replaces human workers in the grouping decision-making process. The controller consistently applies the same algorithms and criteria to all pipeline grouping tasks, eliminating the variability and subjectivity inherent in manual operations, thereby ensuring reproducible results across different workers and different time periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If pipelines are grouped based on scattered high renewal priority locations, then work efficiency can be maintained, but the grouping becomes complex and difficult to manage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework efficiencyVSAvoidgrouping complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the pipeline network into distinct groups based on spatial proximity and attribute similarity. The controller identifies clusters of pipelines that meet specific criteria (such as being within a certain distance threshold and sharing similar characteristics), creating manageable segments that simplify the overall grouping complexity while maintaining work efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by allowing different grouping criteria and parameters to be applied to different regions or segments of the pipeline network. Each group can have its own specific characteristics and optimization parameters, enabling the system to handle scattered high-priority pipelines effectively without imposing a single complex grouping scheme on the entire network.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250217725A1Pipeline grouping apparatus, pipeline grouping method, and non-transitory computer readable medium including pipeline grouping program
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 KUBOTA CORP
  • US20250217725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217725A1 patent drawing
  • US20250217725A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A pipeline grouping apparatus includes a grouping controller configured or programmed to group a plurality of pipelines of a pipe network based on a prescribed indicator, an overlapping group extractor configured or programmed to extract groups including polygons overlapping each other from groups grouped by the grouping controller, each of the polygons encompassing pipelines belonging to a same group, an overlapping area calculator configured or programmed to calculate an overlapping area between overlapping polygons extracted by the overlapping group extractor, and an update controller configured or programmed to regroup, by the grouping controller, pipelines encompassed by the overlapping polygons if the overlapping area calculated by the overlapping area calculator satisfies a first specified condition.