Polygon Machining Phase Control for Faster Axis Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing polygon machining technologies require a significant amount of time for phase alignment between the workpiece axis and the tool axis, especially when a large phase difference needs to be corrected, which can lead to inefficiencies in machining processes.

Innovation Solution

A controller system that includes a machining setting storage unit, current phase calculation unit, machining-allowing phase calculation unit, optimum phase calculation unit, and phase alignment control unit, which calculates and adjusts the phases of the workpiece and tool axes to minimize the time required for phase alignment by determining an optimal phase command value.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If phase alignment is performed by stopping the tool at a predetermined position, then phase alignment between workpiece axis and tool axis is achieved, but machining time is increased due to temporary stopping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase alignment accuracyVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates the optimal phase command value in advance based on the current phase difference, number of cutting tools, and machining program requirements. This preliminary calculation allows the system to plan the phase adjustment trajectory before execution, enabling continuous operation without stopping while achieving accurate phase alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the phase command value during machining operations based on real-time phase measurements and calculated optimal values. The phase alignment control unit continuously modifies rotation phases while maintaining continuous rotation, transforming the static stopping-based alignment into a dynamic continuous adjustment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If phase alignment is performed by accelerating or decelerating the workpiece axis or tool axis, then phase difference is corrected, but a large phase difference requires large phase shift and long alignment time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephase alignment accuracyVSAvoidphase alignment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the phase command value parameter based on the number of cutting tools and current phase difference. By calculating multiple possible phase command values and selecting the optimal one, the system can achieve phase alignment with minimal phase shift regardless of the initial phase difference magnitude, thereby reducing alignment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical approach of large-phase-shift acceleration/deceleration with a computational approach. The phase alignment control unit calculates optimal phase adjustments and executes them through control signals, substituting brute-force mechanical phase correction with intelligent control algorithms that minimize adjustment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If the number of cutting tools and rotation ratio are adjusted to achieve desired polygonal shape, then machining precision is improved, but phase alignment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolygonal shape accuracyVSAvoidphase alignment control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically calculates the optimal phase command value based on the number of cutting tools, current phase difference, and machining program requirements. The phase alignment control unit self-adjusts the phase without requiring external intervention or complex manual coordination, simplifying the control process while maintaining high precision for various polygonal shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system measures the current phase of the workpiece axis and tool axis, compares it with the calculated optimal phase command value, and adjusts the phases accordingly. This feedback mechanism automatically handles the complexity of phase alignment for different cutting tool configurations and rotation ratios, maintaining precision without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12235620B2Controller, control system, and control method of machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.02.25 FANUC LTD
  • US12235620B2 patent drawing
  • US12235620B2 patent drawing
  • US12235620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A time necessary for phase alignment is shortened in a polygon machining device having a plurality of cutting tools. In phase alignment of polygon machining, a phase RCURRENT of the workpiece axis and tool axis before phase alignment and a machining-allowing phase command value RNEW(n) are calculated, a new phase command value R′NEW is calculated while considering restrictions such as a phase alignment method and a maximum rotation speed. By adjusting a phase to the new phase command value R′NEW, a time necessary for phase alignment can be shortened.