Polygonal Container Sidewall with Alignment Ribs for Full Nesting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Thin-walled disposable plastic containers are prone to bending, distortion, and instability due to their thin walls, and they often fail to nest properly when stacked, leading to increased space usage and potential instability.

Innovation Solution

The container features a polygonal frustoconical sidewall with a rotational alignment structure that includes protruding or recessed elements, such as ribs, fingers, or indentions, to enhance structural integrity and facilitate full nesting by aligning adjacent containers during stacking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If thicker material construction is used to strengthen containers, then container strength is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer strengthVSAvoidmaterial thickness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The container sidewall is divided into multiple panel sections separated by annular ribs. This segmentation creates a structured framework that distributes mechanical loads across multiple elements, enhancing overall strength without requiring uniform thickening of the entire container wall.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The annular ribs provide localized reinforcement at specific circumferential positions where structural support is most needed. This allows the container to achieve enhanced strength at critical locations while maintaining thin wall construction in other areas, optimizing material usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If annular ribs are provided in the container sidewall to enhance strength, then container strength is improved, but the strength enhancement is limited especially in middle regions where gripping occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer strengthVSAvoidstrength in gripping regions
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from purely circumferential reinforcement (annular ribs) to include longitudinal reinforcement elements that extend along the height of the container. This adds a vertical dimension to the strengthening strategy, providing support in the middle regions where gripping forces are applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement structure employs non-uniform distribution of strength elements, with increased concentration and complexity in the middle regions of the sidewall where gripping occurs. The panel sections and ribs are strategically positioned to provide enhanced support at these critical locations rather than uniform distribution throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Volume of stationary object

If containers are stacked for shipment and storage, then space efficiency is improved, but containers do not fully nest leading to increased space usage and instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestacking space efficiencyVSAvoidstack stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The container design incorporates geometric features including frustoconical sidewalls and complementary panel sections that enable one container to be fully inserted within another. The shaped sidewalls and panel configurations create interlocking geometries that ensure complete nesting, maximizing space efficiency during storage and shipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The container sidewalls are pre-formed with specific geometric configurations (frustoconical shape, panel section orientations) that automatically guide proper alignment and nesting when containers are stacked. This preliminary geometric preparation ensures that containers self-align into stable nested configurations without requiring additional alignment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Strength

If non-round cross-sectional shapes are used for containers, then container strength and stacking are improved, but containers do not fully nest when stacked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontainer strengthVSAvoidnesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The non-round cross-section is divided into multiple panel sections separated by annular ribs, creating a segmented polygonal structure. This segmentation allows the container to maintain the strength benefits of non-circular geometry while the flat panel sections provide planar surfaces that enable complete nesting when containers are stacked in aligned orientations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240051703A1Container having enhanced wall integrity and alignment element
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 HUHTAMAKI INC
  • US20240051703A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051703A1 patent drawing
  • US20240051703A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A container having enhanced wall integrity is provided that includes a sidewall having a polygonal cross-sectional shape and an alignment structure formed therein. The alignment structure is adapted for orienting the container with respect to a second container such that the panel sections of the containers become parallel with one another, and the containers may be fully nested one within the other. The alignment structure may include a generally parabolic-shape protrusion that extends radially outwardly relative from the sidewall to form peaks along an external surface of the container and valleys along an inner surface of the container. The peaks are adapted to direct corners of the first container's sidewall toward the corners of the second container's sidewall in order to orient the containers as they are stacked.