Polygonal Drum Support Feet Acoustic Decoupling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional drum kit support feet fail to effectively decouple acoustic energy from the floor, leading to energy loss and instability, and often disengage during transport and setup, causing rolling and bouncing issues.

Innovation Solution

The development of support feet with a polygonal cross-section, made from materials like polyurethane foam or Ether-Like-Ester foam, featuring an acoustic reflecting material and a waffled or serrated surface to minimize contact and prevent rolling, which can be easily engaged and adjusted to fit various support legs, including those with existing rubber feet.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional rubber feet are used to provide slip resistant support, then stability is improved, but acoustic decoupling is insufficient leading to energy loss

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestabilityVSAvoidacoustic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The support foot combines multiple materials with different properties: a rigid outer shell for structural integrity and slip resistance, acoustic reflecting material for energy reflection, and compliant inner material for decoupling. This composite structure simultaneously achieves stability and acoustic energy preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the support foot have different material properties optimized for specific functions: the outer surface provides friction for stability, the interior cavity reflects acoustic energy, and the compliant material at the contact point provides decoupling. Each local region is tailored to its specific functional requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Ease of operation

If rounded rubber feet are used for easy engagement, then ease of operation is improved, but rolling and bouncing occurs during transport

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of engagementVSAvoidanti-rolling stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The support foot features a polygonal cross-section (square, rectangular, or triangular) instead of a rounded shape. This asymmetric geometry prevents rolling and bouncing during transport while maintaining ease of engagement through the friction-fit cavity design. The flat surfaces of the polygonal shape provide stable resting positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Ease of operation

If stretch and fit rubber feet are used for simple installation, then ease of operation is improved, but acoustic decoupling effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installationVSAvoidacoustic energy transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The support foot is divided into distinct functional segments: an outer shell for protection and engagement, an interior cavity for acoustic reflection, and compliant material for decoupling. This segmentation allows each component to optimize its specific function while maintaining simple installation through the friction-fit design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The compliant material acts as an intermediary between the rigid support leg and the floor, providing acoustic decoupling. This intermediate layer prevents direct transmission of acoustic energy to the floor while maintaining mechanical support, resolving the contradiction between simple installation and acoustic effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Force

If conventional feet are used to support drum components, then support function is improved, but acoustic resonance and sound quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport forceVSAvoidacoustic deadening effect
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The support foot converts the potentially harmful acoustic energy that would be lost to the floor into a beneficial reflected energy source. The acoustic reflecting material redirects vibratory energy back toward the drum or cymbal, turning energy loss into enhanced sound quality and prolonged resonance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The support foot changes the acoustic parameters of the support system by introducing reflective surfaces and decoupling materials. This alters the acoustic impedance and energy transmission characteristics, transforming the support function from purely mechanical to also acoustic, thereby reducing deadening effects and enhancing resonance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

These feet provide enhanced acoustic decoupling, reduce energy loss, and prevent rolling and bouncing, ensuring stable support and improved sound quality while being easy to use and transport.

Implementation Method 1

employs means for reflecting the acoustic vibratory energy back into the drum or cymbal to thereby reduce energy loss and enhance the musical sound emitted from the drum or cymbal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

the feet are known to provide a means for resisting or dampening the transmission of the energy of the vibrating drum head through the rigid legs to the floor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration damping: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS9640153B2Acoustic decoupling device
Publication Date: 2017.05.02 WILEY RICHARD
  • US9640153B2 patent drawing
  • US9640153B2 patent drawing
  • US9640153B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drum-supporting component is provided for maintaining a drum or cymbal acoustically separated from an underlying support surface. A body of the component is configured to maintain the drum separated from the underlying support thereby increasing the sound generated from the drum which is projected therefrom.