Polygonal Isolation Coupler for Structural Shock and Vibration Attenuation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shock and vibration attenuation methods in the aerospace industry face challenges in effectively reducing mechanical shocks and vibrations transmitted to functional equipment, particularly due to space and weight constraints, and the need for high flexibility and load attenuation.

Innovation Solution

A two-piece structural bracket assembly with a polygonal shape and a tongue and groove interface, featuring a series of isolators that separate the brackets to attenuate loads, providing adjustable levels of load attenuation and vibration isolation across a wide frequency spectrum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional shock attenuation methods are used, then mechanical shocks and vibrations can be reduced, but space and weight constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical shocks and vibrationsVSAvoidweight of attenuation device
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The isolation coupler is divided into multiple isolators arranged in a polygonal configuration, where each isolator independently handles portions of the shock and vibration loads. This segmentation allows the system to achieve effective attenuation while using lighter individual components compared to a single massive attenuator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The isolators are constructed from composite materials that provide high shock attenuation capability with reduced weight. These materials enable the system to meet stringent weight constraints while maintaining effective mechanical shock and vibration reduction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If traditional shock attenuation methods are used, then mechanical shocks and vibrations can be reduced, but space constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical shocks and vibrationsVSAvoidspace occupied by attenuation device
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The attenuation function is segmented into multiple compact isolators arranged in a polygonal pattern, which distributes the space requirement across a compact footprint rather than requiring a single large volume device. This enables effective shock attenuation within tight space constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The isolators are arranged in a two-dimensional polygonal configuration rather than a linear or volumetric arrangement, maximizing space utilization efficiency. This dimensional approach allows the system to achieve effective attenuation with minimal space occupation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Strength

If rigid coupling is used, then structural strength is improved, but shock and vibration transmission to functional equipment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidshock and vibration transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The isolators serve as intermediary elements between the functional equipment and the support structure, providing mechanical coupling while simultaneously attenuating shock and vibration transmissions. This intermediary approach maintains structural strength without directly transmitting harmful dynamic loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The isolators change the mechanical parameters of the coupling system by introducing controlled compliance and damping characteristics. This allows the system to maintain overall structural strength while modifying the transmission of dynamic loads to protect sensitive equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If heavy-duty attenuation devices are used, then load attenuation capability is improved, but weight and space constraints are violated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload attenuation capabilityVSAvoiddesign flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The attenuation capability is distributed across multiple isolators rather than concentrated in a single heavy device, enabling the system to achieve high reliability while maintaining design flexibility and meeting weight constraints through modular configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively attenuates mechanical shocks and vibrations by distributing forces through the isolators, preventing damage to functional equipment and offering a high degree of design flexibility, strength, and load dampening between 3 dB and 20 dB.

Implementation Method 1

the isolators separate each one of the first-bracket sides from a corresponding one of the second-bracket sides to attenuate a load transferred from the first bracket to the second bracket

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration isolation: Damping

Implementation Method 2

A vibration isolation module for preventing telecommunication facilities from being damaged by an earthquake... damp external vibration by absorbing the external vibration through viscoelastic deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP3696445B1Isolation coupler for a structural assembly and method for attentuating a load
Publication Date: 2024.02.07 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3696445B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3696445B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3696445B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An isolation coupler (100) for coupling a functional element (204) to a support structure (202) includes a first bracket (102). The first bracket (102) includes a number of first-bracket sides (106). The number of first-bracket sides (106) forms a closed polygonal shape, in plan view. The isolation coupler (100) further includes a number of isolators (110) coupled to each one of the first-bracket sides (106). The isolation coupler (100) also includes a second bracket (104). The second bracket (104) includes a number of second-bracket sides (108). The second bracket sides (108) are coupled to the isolators (110). The number of second-bracket sides (108) is equal to the number of first-bracket sides (106) and forms the closed polygonal shape, in plan view. The isolators (110) separate each one of the first-bracket sides (106) from a corresponding one of the second-bracket sides (108) to attenuate a load transferred from the first bracket (102) to the second bracket (104).