Polygonal Object Detection Window for Autonomous Driving Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current object detection technologies in autonomous driving systems face challenges in accurately recognizing the position of tilted objects within images due to the need for larger rectangular windows, which include unnecessary areas, and struggle with real-time processing requirements for semantic segmentation.

Innovation Solution

An electronic device with a processor that identifies areas of change and stability in moving images, merges image information from stable areas to enhance object detection using polygonal windows with five or more angles, allowing for more accurate object positioning and distance measurement while minimizing computational load.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If rectangular windows are used to detect tilted objects, then the detection coverage is improved, but the detection precision deteriorates due to including unnecessary areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidobject position precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection window from a fixed rectangular shape to a dynamic polygonal shape that adapts to the detected object's orientation and boundaries. This segmentation allows the detection window to be divided into relevant and irrelevant regions, improving precision by excluding unnecessary areas while maintaining coverage of the tilted object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from two-dimensional rectangular detection windows to polygonal windows with five or more vertices, adding geometric flexibility. This dimensional change in the window shape space enables precise fitting around tilted objects of various orientations, resolving the contradiction between coverage and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If semantic segmentation is applied to accurately extract objects, then the detection precision is improved, but the processing speed deteriorates due to large computation amount

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject extraction precisionVSAvoidreal-time processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of applying full semantic segmentation to the entire image, the patent applies object detection only to relevant regions identified by the polygonal window. This partial action approach maintains high precision by focusing computational resources on areas containing objects, while avoiding the excessive computation of segmenting the entire image, thus enabling real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary object detection to identify potential object locations and orientations before applying more precise detection methods. This preliminary action using polygonal windows pre-segments the image into relevant and irrelevant regions, reducing the computational load for subsequent precise extraction while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If larger rectangular windows are used for tilted objects, then the detection coverage is improved, but the computational load increases due to processing larger areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection coverageVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection area into a polygonal shape that precisely follows the object's boundaries and orientation. This segmentation eliminates the need to process the entire large rectangular area, reducing computational energy consumption by focusing only on the relevant portion of the image while maintaining adequate coverage of the tilted object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different detection strategies to different regions of the image based on local characteristics. High-priority processing is applied only to regions containing detected objects using polygonal windows, while other regions receive minimal or no processing. This local quality approach reduces overall computational energy consumption while maintaining detection coverage where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240404103A1Electronic device for detecting object, and control method therefor
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 MINDFORGE CO LTD
  • US20240404103A1 patent drawing
  • US20240404103A1 patent drawing
  • US20240404103A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An object detection device is disclosed. The object detection device of the present disclosure comprises a memory and at least one processor operatively connected to the memory, wherein the at least one processor can acquire a video, identify, in the video, a region in which content is changed in real time and a region in which content is not changed in real time, acquire image information about the video, and merge the image information into the region in which content is not changed in real time.