Polygonal Poultry Feeder Reducing Weight Variance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing poultry feeders result in excessive variance in bird weights due to competition for food, uneven feed distribution, and inefficient use of space, leading to inconsistent product weights and increased resource costs.

Innovation Solution

A polygonal poultry feeder with a pyramidal base and central supply tube, featuring a feed cone with radial strakes and multiple holes for even feed distribution, and a support system allowing adjustable feed flow and easy cleaning, which reduces competition and optimizes feed access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If traditional circular feeders are used, then poultry can congregate around the feeder, but excessive competition for food occurs resulting in high weight variance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed accessVSAvoidweight consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feeder is divided into multiple independent feeding stations arranged around the periphery, each with its own feed outlet. This segmentation distributes poultry across multiple stations rather than having them congregate in one location, reducing competition and weight variance while maintaining adequate feed access for the flock.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feeder provides different feeding zones at different locations around the periphery. Each feeding station has optimized feed flow characteristics, and the polygonal shape creates distinct angular sections that allow poultry to feed simultaneously in multiple locations with reduced competition, improving weight consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If feed delivery rate is increased to meet production demands, then feed supply meets requirements, but weight consistency deteriorates due to overfeeding and competition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed supply rateVSAvoidweight consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The total feed delivery is segmented across multiple independent feeding stations rather than one large centralized feed source. This allows the system to maintain high overall productivity by serving multiple birds simultaneously while each station delivers controlled portions, preventing overfeeding and maintaining weight consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The feeder design provides sufficient feed capacity to meet high production demands through multiple stations, but controls the actual feed intake at each station to appropriate levels. This partial action approach ensures adequate total supply while preventing individual overfeeding that would harm weight consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Quantity of substance

If feeder size is increased to provide more feeding space, then more poultry can feed simultaneously, but floor space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeeding capacityVSAvoidfloor space
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The feeder transitions from a traditional horizontal floor-based design to a vertical suspended configuration. By utilizing the vertical dimension and suspending the feeder from overhead structures, the design provides large feeding capacity for multiple poultry simultaneously while occupying minimal floor space, as the feeding stations are arranged in three-dimensional space around the periphery.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Productivity

If feed apertures are made large to allow high feed flow, then feed supply is adequate, but poultry can enter and defecate in feed causing contamination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed flow rateVSAvoidfeed contamination
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The feed delivery system is segmented into controlled outlets at each feeding station rather than one large open aperture. This segmentation maintains adequate feed flow rate through multiple smaller controlled openings while preventing poultry from entering the feed supply mechanism, as each outlet is designed to deliver feed directly to the feeding pan without creating access points for birds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The polygonal feeder design minimizes weight variance, increases feeding space, and reduces competition, resulting in more consistent bird weights and improved resource efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the base is inclined towards the centre of the feeder to direct feed towards the side walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP2488014B1A poultry feeder
Publication Date: 2020.06.17 PTN
  • EP2488014B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2488014B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2488014B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A feeder is provided, in particular for feeding poultry, comprising a polygonal feeding pan defined by a base and a plurality of side walls depending from the base. The side walls define an outer peripheral edge of the feeder having a plurality of substantially straight outer edges. The feeder provides increased feeding space and feed volume with respect to a circular feeder having a radius equal to the apothem of the polygonal feeding pan.