Polygonal Structural Frame for Solar Collector Torque Transmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) systems face challenges in maintaining structural integrity and efficiency due to high temperature and wind loading, which cause physical stresses and distortions in large mirror panels, necessitating an improved frame design that balances stiffness, weight, and cost.

Innovation Solution

A three-dimensional structural frame with polygonal primary shapes and axial members forming helical paths for torque transmission, combined with a reflector support structure that allows for efficient material use and reduced part complexity, enabling better torsional and bending strength while minimizing deflection and weight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If conventional frame designs are used to support large mirror panels, then structural stability is maintained, but material usage and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmaterial usage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple identical modular units, each comprising a polygonal arrangement of frame members connected by hubs. This segmentation allows the structure to achieve required stability through distributed geometry rather than excessive material, with each module contributing to overall structural rigidity through its polygonal configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention transitions from conventional planar or simple spatial arrangements to a three-dimensional polygonal configuration. Frame members are arranged in polygonal shapes (triangles, quadrilaterals, pentagons, hexagons) that extend into the third dimension, creating inherent structural stability through geometric configuration rather than material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Strength

If frame stiffness is increased to resist wind loading and maintain alignment, then structural integrity improves, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe stiffnessVSAvoidframe complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into multiple identical modular units, each comprising a polygonal arrangement of frame members connected by hubs. This segmentation allows the structure to achieve required stability through distributed geometry rather than excessive material, with each module contributing to overall structural rigidity through its polygonal configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the frame structure by employing polygonal configurations with specific angular relationships. Frame members are arranged at angles that optimize torsional and bending resistance, transforming the structural behavior through geometric parameter optimization rather than increasing material quantity or complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If more material is used to reduce deflection under load, then structural strength improves, but cost and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to deflectionVSAvoidmaterial quantity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from conventional planar or simple spatial arrangements to a three-dimensional polygonal configuration. Frame members are arranged in polygonal shapes (triangles, quadrilaterals, pentagons, hexagons) that extend into the third dimension, creating inherent structural stability through geometric configuration rather than material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the frame structure by employing polygonal configurations with specific angular relationships. Frame members are arranged at angles that optimize torsional and bending resistance, transforming the structural behavior through geometric parameter optimization rather than increasing material quantity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Force

If conventional torque transfer assemblies with central shafts are used, then torque transmission is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmissionVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The torque transfer function is segmented across multiple polygonal frame modules rather than concentrated in a single central shaft. Each module's polygonal configuration inherently provides torque resistance, and the distributed hub connections transmit torque through the modular assembly, eliminating the need for complex central torque transfer mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using a central shaft to transmit torque outward to multiple modules, the invention inverts the approach by having each polygonal module inherently resist torque through its geometric configuration, with torque transmission occurring through the distributed hub connections between modules rather than through a central rotating element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed frame design enhances the structural integrity and efficiency of CSP systems by maintaining alignment and focus under wind loading and temperature stress, while reducing material usage and assembly complexity, thus improving energy collection performance.

Implementation Method 1

axial frame members joining corners of adjacent primary structural shapes such that the axial frame members form helical paths for the transmission of torque from one longitudinal end of the structural frame to the other

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorque transmission: Torque

Implementation Method 2

a reflector coupled to the three-dimensional structural frame and shaped to concentrate solar radiation onto a receiver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolar radiation concentration: Focusing

Implementation Method 3

focusing reflectors that concentrate incoming solar radiation onto a tubular conduit that contains a working fluid. The focused radiation heats the working fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolar energy conversion: Solar Energy

Data Source

PatentUS10436478B2Structural frame and solar collector module
Publication Date: 2019.10.08 ABENGOA SOLAR LLC
  • US10436478B2 patent drawing
  • US10436478B2 patent drawing
  • US10436478B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Solar collector modules and techniques for their construction are disclosed. In one aspect, a solar collector module includes a reflector and a three-dimensional structural frame that supports the reflector. The structural frame includes a set of primary structural shapes and a set of axial frame members connected between corners of the primary structural shapes forming helical paths for the transmission of torque from one end of the structural frame to the other. In another aspect, a method for assembling a solar collector module includes pre-assembling part of the module.