Polyimide FSR for Handheld Controller Miniaturization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hand-held video game controllers with force sensing resistors (FSRs) exhibit crude response curves and are difficult to miniaturize due to materials used, limiting their suitability for virtual reality applications, where precise and natural interaction is required.

Innovation Solution

A FSR constructed with a polyimide substrate and interdigitated metal fingers, allowing for direct soldering and high-temperature manufacturing, providing a more precise and repeatable Force vs. Resistance response curve, enabling improved user interaction in VR systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If mylar-based FSR is used, then the FSR can be constructed with flexible materials, but the FSR consumes large footprint and is difficult to miniaturize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flexibilityVSAvoidFSR footprint
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a flexible printed circuit board (FPC) as the substrate for the FSR, replacing traditional mylar construction. The FPC maintains flexibility while enabling direct soldering and compact integration, thus reducing footprint while preserving the flexible material characteristics needed for FSR operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical mylar-based construction with an FPC-based system that allows direct electrical connection through soldering. This substitution eliminates the need for large header connectors, enabling miniaturization while maintaining the mechanical flexibility required for force sensing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If mylar-based FSR is used, then the FSR can be constructed with flexible materials, but it cannot tolerate high temperatures of reflow oven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flexibilityVSAvoidreflow oven temperature tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a flexible printed circuit board (FPC) substrate that combines the flexibility of thin film materials with the high-temperature tolerance required for reflow soldering processes. The FPC can withstand reflow oven temperatures while maintaining its flexible characteristics for FSR operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure using FPC substrate combined with force sensing elements. This composite material approach allows the FSR to achieve both flexibility from the FPC material and high-temperature tolerance through the engineered composite structure, enabling survival in reflow soldering processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Stability of the object's composition

If PCB substrate is used for FSR, then the FSR can be constructed with rigid structure, but the response curve is crude and non-monotonic

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidForce vs. Resistance response curve quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a flexible printed circuit board (FPC) substrate instead of rigid PCB, allowing the FSR to maintain structural stability while achieving smooth, monotonic response curves. The FPC's flexible nature enables better force distribution and more accurate force-to-resistance conversion compared to rigid PCB substrates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

4Adaptability or versatility

If mylar-based FSR with header connector is used, then the FSR can be constructed with flexible materials, but manufacturing costs cannot be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical header connector system with direct soldering connections on the FPC substrate. This substitution eliminates the need for separate connector components and assembly steps, enabling more cost-effective manufacturing while maintaining flexibility through the FPC construction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the FSR sensing element directly with the FPC substrate, eliminating the need for separate header connectors and reducing component count. This integration combines multiple functions into a single unified structure, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while preserving flexible material characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The polyimide-based FSR offers a smaller footprint, reduced manufacturing costs, and enhanced repeatability, enabling more natural and precise user interactions in VR systems by translating varying forces into analog inputs, reducing user fatigue and accidental actuations.

Implementation Method 1

the force sensing resistor (FSR), which uses variable resistance to measure an amount of force applied to the FSR

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoresistive effect: Piezoresistive Effect

Data Source

PatentUS10649583B1Sensor fusion algorithms for a handheld controller that includes a force sensing resistor (FSR)
Publication Date: 2020.05.12 VALVE CORPORATION
  • US10649583B1 patent drawing
  • US10649583B1 patent drawing
  • US10649583B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Logic of a handheld controller can implement sensor fusion algorithms based on force data provided by a force sensing resistor (FSR) in combination with touch sensor data provided by a touch sensor. An example sensor fusion algorithm can be used to pause calibration adjustments for the touch sensor—at least with respect to a high-level value that corresponds to a touch of a control—in response to a user pressing upon the control of the handheld controller with an above-threshold amount of force, which may be detected by a FSR associated with the control. For instance, calibration adjustments with respect to the high-level value can be paused in response to FSR values crossing a threshold value from below the threshold value to above the threshold value, and the calibration adjustments can be resumed in response to the FSR values crossing the threshold value in the opposite direction.