Road Polyline Conflation with Linear Optimization for Complex Intersections

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional conflation processes in GIS databases struggle with accurately matching road polylines, particularly in complex scenarios like intricate intersections and small links, due to a lack of consideration for surrounding context and neighboring roads, leading to inefficiencies and reduced accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A conflation process that calculates geometric similarity between road pairs using a modified Hausdorff distance metric and strict eligibility criteria, framing the problem as a linear programming optimization with post-process validation to enhance accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional conflation processes are used to match road polylines, then the basic matching function is provided, but the accuracy is reduced in complex scenarios like intricate intersections and small links due to lack of consideration for surrounding context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad polyline matching accuracyVSAvoidconflation process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conflation process is divided into multiple stages: pre-processing to identify candidate pairs based on simple metrics, main conflation stage using optimized algorithms considering surrounding context, and post-processing validation. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex scenarios systematically without overwhelming computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces consideration of surrounding context and neighboring roads as an additional dimension to the traditional pair-wise polyline matching. By evaluating road polylines in the context of their neighborhood and using multi-metric optimization, the system achieves higher accuracy in complex intersections while maintaining manageable process complexity through structured approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If conventional conflation processes are used, then the matching process is simple, but the efficiency is reduced due to inability to handle complex scenarios effectively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconflation process efficiencyVSAvoidmatching process simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing road polylines to identify candidate pairs based on initial similarity metrics before performing the main conflation analysis. This pre-filtering step efficiently reduces the number of pairs requiring detailed analysis, improving overall productivity while maintaining operational simplicity through automated multi-stage processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The conflation process incorporates feedback mechanisms through post-processing validation where results are reviewed and refined. This feedback loop allows the system to correct mismatches in complex scenarios and improve efficiency by learning from previous iterations, while the automated nature maintains ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If conventional conflation processes are used, then the processing speed is maintained, but the accuracy is insufficient in complex scenarios such as intricate intersections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad polyline matching accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the conflation process into pre-processing, main conflation, and post-processing stages, the system efficiently allocates computational resources. Candidate pair identification is performed quickly using simple metrics, while only promising pairs undergo detailed analysis considering surrounding context, thus improving accuracy in complex scenarios without excessive time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts parameters and thresholds at different stages of the conflation process. By optimizing similarity metrics and eligibility criteria based on the complexity of road network scenarios, the system achieves high accuracy in intricate intersections while maintaining reasonable processing times through adaptive parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260079029A1Conflation between target and source road polylines from GIS databases
Publication Date: 2026.03.19 TRIMBLE INC
  • US20260079029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079029A1 patent drawing
  • US20260079029A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein are systems, methods, and other techniques for performing conflation between target road polylines and source road polylines stored in GIS databases. A pairing of a target road polyline and a source road polyline is obtained. The target road polyline and the source road polyline each include a sequence of connected 2D or 3D vertices that form a continuous line. A similarity score is computed between the target road polyline and the source road polyline based on one or more similarity metrics. A conflation classification is assigned to the target road polyline, the source road polyline, or the pairing based on the similarity score.The conflation classification is one of a set of possible conflation classifications. A post-classification action is performed based on the conflation classification.