Polymer Blend Design Using Learned Models for Multi-Property Targets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing material design systems for polymer materials lack consideration of blending substances and order, making them unsuitable for designing polymers that simultaneously satisfy multiple desired physical properties, and are inefficient due to reliance on trial and error.

Innovation Solution

A material design apparatus and method that utilizes a learned model to correlate monomer blend proportions with polymer properties, allowing for the generation and selection of comprehensive analysis points within specified ranges to efficiently design polymers that meet multiple physical property requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If trial production based on material developer experience is performed, then design conditions can be adjusted, but repeated trials are required which consume considerable time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign condition accuracyVSAvoidtime for repeated trials
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary computation and simulation before actual trial production. The material design support system calculates optimal blending proportions and polymerization conditions using learned models and global search algorithms, preparing design conditions in advance to avoid repeated trials during actual production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical trial-and-error process with an information processing system. A computer-based material design support system uses machine learning models and optimization algorithms to predict material properties and determine optimal conditions, substituting physical trial production with computational analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If local condition search is performed in the vicinity of previous design conditions, then adjustment is simple, but global search for optimal design condition is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of condition adjustmentVSAvoidglobal search capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The material design support system performs multiple functions: it can conduct both local searches around existing conditions and global searches across the entire parameter space. The system uses different search algorithms selectively based on the design stage and requirements, making it adaptable to various search needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The search strategy is dynamic and adaptive. The system transitions from global search to local search as the design process progresses, and adjusts search parameters based on feedback from previous trials and learned models, making the search process flexible and responsive

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Extent of automation

If existing material design support systems are used, then inverse problem analysis can be performed, but they do not consider blending substances and order which are essential for polymer design

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of inverse problem analysisVSAvoidsuitability for polymer material design
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system extends the parameter space of inverse problem analysis to include monomer blending proportions, number of monomers, and polymerization stage assignments. These additional parameters are specifically tailored for polymer material design, making the automated system adaptable to polymer synthesis requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system handles composite polymer materials consisting of multiple monomer types blended in specific proportions. It considers the combination of different monomers and their sequential polymerization in multiple stages, enabling design of complex polymer compositions that go beyond simple materials

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS12579331B2Material design apparatus, material design method, and material design program
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 RESONAC CORP
  • US12579331B2 patent drawing
  • US12579331B2 patent drawing
  • US12579331B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A material design apparatus includes a learned model that has learned a correspondence between input information about a blend proportion of a monomer and output information about physical property values of a polymer by machine learning. Each unit of the material design apparatus is configured to: receive as input a blend proportion range of at least one monomer; receive required ranges of physical property values of a polymer; generate a comprehensive analysis point of a polymer polymerized from multiple monomers, the multiple monomers including, within the blend proportion range, at least one monomer of which the blend proportion range is input; input the generated comprehensive analysis point into the learned model to calculate physical property values of a polymer, to create a data set, and to store the created data set; and select a polymer within the required ranges of the physical property values from the data set.