Polymer Brush Nanolithography for Sub-50 nm Patterning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current high-resolution lithographic processes face challenges in producing features below 50 nm due to line edge roughness, critical dimension control, and patterned structure collapse, necessitating new materials and processes for nanometer precision and exacting tolerances.

Innovation Solution

The creation of patterned features using polymer brushes grafted to a substrate, where the dimensions are controlled by adjusting grafting density and molecular weight, allowing for high aspect ratios, atomically smooth surfaces, and reshaping through thermal or solvent treatments, independent of the chemical nature of the polymer brush.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If chemically amplified resists are used for high-resolution lithography, then feature dimensions can be reduced below 100 nm, but line edge roughness increases and critical dimension control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature dimension controlVSAvoidline edge roughness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter from chemically amplified resists to polymer brushes, and adjusts parameters such as grafting density and molecular weight to achieve smooth line edges and controlled critical dimensions below 50 nm without the roughness issues of conventional resists

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses composite structures combining inorganic substrates with grafted polymer brush layers, creating a hybrid material system that provides both structural support and controlled self-assembling patterning capabilities for high-precision features

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Manufacturing precision

If feature dimensions are reduced below 50 nm, then higher integration density is achieved, but patterned structures collapse due to capillary forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature dimensionVSAvoidstructure stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs thin polymer brush films grafted to the substrate that form flexible yet stable patterned structures, maintaining structural integrity at sub-50 nm dimensions while allowing controlled conformational adjustments to resist collapse from capillary forces during processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical lithographic patterning with a self-assembling chemical system using polymer brushes, where molecular-level forces and conformational changes enable stable pattern formation without the mechanical stresses that cause collapse in traditional top-down approaches

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional lithographic materials are used, then existing process compatibility is maintained, but nanometer precision and exacting tolerances cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess compatibilityVSAvoidnanometer precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates polymer brush systems that can serve multiple functions: they provide nanometer-scale precision patterning, act as self-assembling templates, and can be integrated with various substrate types and subsequent processing steps, making the approach universally applicable across different manufacturing platforms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of features with aspect ratios of at least 1:100, line edge roughness of no more than 10 nm, and surface roughness of no more than 5 nm, suitable for applications like reactive ion etching, with the ability to reshape features post-patterning for optimized performance.

Implementation Method 1

The self-assembling nature of the polymer brush allows for optimization of the brush for post-patterning applications

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelf-assembling: Self-Assembly

Implementation Method 2

Once the brushes are patterned, the features can be shaped and reshaped with thermal or solvent treatments to achieve the desired profiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal treatment: Heat Treatment

Implementation Method 3

Once the brushes are patterned, the features can be shaped and reshaped with thermal or solvent treatments to achieve the desired profiles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolvent treatment: Solvation

Data Source

PatentUS7514764B2Materials and methods for creating imaging layers
Publication Date: 2009.04.07 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US7514764B2 patent drawing
  • US7514764B2 patent drawing
  • US7514764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides patterned features of dimensions of less than 50 nm on a substrate. According to various embodiments, the features may be “Manhattan” style structures, have high aspect ratios, and/or have atomically smooth surfaces. The patterned features are made from polymer brushes grafted to a substrate. In some embodiments, the dimensions of the features may be determined by adjusting the grafting density and/or the molecular weight of the brushes. Once the brushes are patterned, the features can be shaped and reshaped with thermal or solvent treatments to achieve the desired profiles. The chemical nature of the polymer brush is thus independent of the patterning process, which allows for optimization of the polymer brush used for specific applications. Applications include masks for pattern transfer techniques such as reactive ion etching.