Polymer Fingerprint Analysis via Machine Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing polymer samples are inefficient and inaccurate in determining matches between new and previously analyzed samples, often requiring extensive and time-consuming testing, which can lead to errors and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of machine learning models trained on datasets from various analyses such as TGA, DSC, and IR to identify matching polymer samples by comparing their analysis results, allowing for the determination of whether a new sample matches a previously analyzed sample, thereby reducing the need for repetitive testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional manual analysis methods are used to compare polymer samples, then measurement precision can be maintained through expert chemist evaluation, but analysis time and labor costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer sample identification accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates digital fingerprints by extracting and storing characteristic data points from polymer analysis results. These digital representations are then compared automatically using machine learning models, replacing the need for manual chemist evaluation while maintaining identification accuracy. The system copies essential polymer characteristics into a comparable format that can be processed algorithmically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of manual data comparison by trained chemists with an automated machine learning-based comparison system. The machine learning models automatically compare digital fingerprints of polymer samples, eliminating human intervention in the comparison process while maintaining or improving identification accuracy through algorithmic pattern recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive polymer analysis is performed on every sample, then identification accuracy is improved, but testing costs and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepolymer type identification accuracyVSAvoidtesting efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and isolates specific characteristic data points from comprehensive polymer analyses to create condensed digital fingerprints. Instead of storing and comparing entire analysis datasets, the system extracts only the most discriminating features (such as specific TGA temperature points, DSC enthalpy values, or IR spectral peaks) that are sufficient for accurate polymer identification, thereby reducing data volume and comparison time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis on a set of reference polymer samples to establish a database of digital fingerprints and train machine learning models. This preliminary work creates a reference framework that enables rapid automatic identification of new samples without requiring comprehensive re-analysis, as the trained models can quickly match new samples against the reference database.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual comparison of analysis results is performed, then flexibility in handling complex cases is maintained, but error rates increase and consistency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in analysis interpretationVSAvoididentification consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where machine learning models continuously learn from new data and refine their identification algorithms. The system can be retrained with new reference samples and can adjust its comparison criteria based on emerging patterns in polymer data, maintaining adaptability while improving consistency through iterative improvement of the machine learning models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent allows for dynamic adjustment of comparison parameters and weightings in the machine learning models. Different polymer characteristics can be emphasized or de-emphasized based on specific application requirements, enabling the system to adapt to different identification priorities while maintaining consistent, objective comparison criteria that eliminate human variability in interpretation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240054388A1Methods and systems for polymeric fingerprint analysis and identification
Publication Date: 2024.02.15 UL LLC
  • US20240054388A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054388A1 patent drawing
  • US20240054388A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An example method includes receiving training data for training of a machine learning model. The training data includes a plurality of pairs of datasets. Each of the pairs of datasets includes a reference dataset and a sample dataset. The reference dataset is indicative of first results of a first plastic sample analysis and the sample dataset is indicative of second results of a second plastic sample analysis. Each of the pairs of datasets further includes an indication, for each of the pairs of datasets, that features of the sample dataset and the reference dataset are a match. The method further includes training a machine learning model based on the training data to determine matches between datasets. The method further includes receiving a new sample dataset. The method further includes determining, using the trained machine learning model, that the new sample dataset matches another dataset.