Modular Polymer Lower Receiver With Metal Inserts for Impact Strength

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lower receivers for firearms are typically made from metal due to issues with polymer materials, such as sink formation, complex mold requirements, and structural integrity under impact loads, making polymer alternatives costly and difficult to implement.

Innovation Solution

A modular lower receiver design using polymer components with complementary engagement surfaces and threaded inserts, allowing for separate assembly of grip attachment bodies and bolt catch assemblies, which reduces molding complexity and weight while maintaining structural integrity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Weight of moving object

If lower receivers are made from polymer, then weight is reduced and manufacturing cost decreases, but structural integrity under impact loads and shear stresses deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight of lower receiverVSAvoidstructural integrity under impact loads
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a composite construction where a polymer lower receiver body is combined with metal threaded inserts and metal grip attachment bodies. This composite approach allows the polymer to provide weight reduction and cost benefits while the metal components supply the necessary structural integrity and strength under impact loads and shear stresses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of manufacture

If lower receivers are made from polymer with thick sections, then manufacturing cost decreases, but sink formation occurs during injection molding

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidsurface quality free from sinks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the lower receiver into multiple segments: the polymer main body and separate metal components (threaded inserts, grip attachment bodies). This segmentation eliminates the need for thick polymer sections, preventing sink formation during injection molding while maintaining manufacturing cost efficiency through polymer usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the threaded features and grip attachment bodies from the polymer structure and implements them as separate metal components. This extraction eliminates the need for thick polymer sections that would cause sinking, while allowing the polymer body to be manufactured with optimal wall thickness for cost-effective injection molding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Adaptability or versatility

If lower receivers include small, deep holes, then functional features are achieved, but very small steel tools are required that would deflect or break

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional featuresVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates threaded inserts and internal features into the polymer lower receiver body during the injection molding process itself, before final assembly. This preliminary action eliminates the need for subsequent machining operations with small, fragile steel tools, as the features are formed directly in the molding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If lower receivers include slide actions on many angles, then functional features are achieved, but mold becomes expensive and complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional featuresVSAvoidmold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the lower receiver into a polymer main body and separate metal components that are assembled together. This segmentation allows complex functional features to be achieved through assembly of pre-formed components rather than through complex multi-angle slide actions in the mold, significantly simplifying the molding process and reducing mold cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

5Adaptability or versatility

If lower receivers include threaded holes for attachments, then adaptability is improved, but thread-forming slide action tool details become expensive and complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment capabilityVSAvoidmold complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the threaded features from the polymer molding process and implements them as separate metal threaded inserts that are integrated into the polymer body. This extraction eliminates the need for complex thread-forming slide action tools in the mold, reducing mold complexity and cost while maintaining attachment capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12504242B2Modular lower receiver
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 SMITH & WESSON INC
  • US12504242B2 patent drawing
  • US12504242B2 patent drawing
  • US12504242B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A lower receiver includes a polymer main body having an outer surface and defining an interior. The interior of the polymer main body defines a first socket. A grip attachment body is receivable, along a first axis, into the first socket of the interior of the polymer main body. The grip attachment body includes a first threaded insert that is configured to receive a fastener for securing a grip to the lower receiver.