Polymer Separator Composition for Lamination Pressure Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing separators for electrochemical devices face deformation and pore damage during lamination due to high pressure, leading to reduced insulation breakdown voltage and potential failures like Hi-Pot and low-voltage failures.

Innovation Solution

A separator comprising a porous polymer substrate with a non-crystalline and crystalline polymer resin blend, optimized through temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF) to achieve a weight-average molecular weight of 100,000 or more, with specific resin content and ratio adjustments to enhance compression resistance and uniformity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If high pressure is applied during lamination to bond the separator and electrodes, then bonding strength is improved, but the separator deforms and pores are damaged leading to reduced insulation breakdown voltage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding strengthVSAvoidinsulation breakdown voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the molecular weight parameter of the crystalline polymer resin to a specific range (weight-average molecular weight of 100,000 or more) to optimize the balance between bonding strength and insulation performance. This parameter change allows the separator to withstand lamination pressure while maintaining pore structure and insulation breakdown voltage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a composite material system consisting of both crystalline polymer resin and non-crystalline polymer resin in specific proportions (crystalline: 60-100 wt%, non-crystalline: 0-40 wt%). This composite structure combines the mechanical strength of crystalline regions with the flexibility and bonding capability of non-crystalline regions, resolving the contradiction between bonding strength and insulation performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Shape

If the crystalline polymer resin content is increased to improve compression resistance, then deformation during lamination is reduced, but the bonding ability may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompression resistanceVSAvoidbonding ability
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the molecular weight parameter of the crystalline polymer resin (weight-average molecular weight ≥100,000) to achieve both high compression resistance and adequate bonding ability. The specific molecular weight range ensures that the crystalline regions provide structural stability while maintaining appropriate chain mobility for bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite material system where crystalline polymer resin (60-100 wt%) provides compression resistance and structural stability, while non-crystalline polymer resin (0-40 wt%) contributes to bonding ability and flexibility. This composition balance resolves the contradiction between maintaining shape and achieving strong bonding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Shape

If the molecular weight of the crystalline polymer resin is increased to prevent deformation, then compression resistance is improved, but the processing difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation resistanceVSAvoidprocessing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies an optimal molecular weight range for the crystalline polymer resin (weight-average molecular weight of 100,000 or more) that balances deformation resistance with processability. This parameter optimization ensures that the high molecular weight provides sufficient mechanical strength while maintaining adequate chain mobility for processing operations like extrusion and forming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution minimizes deformation and maintains insulation breakdown voltage, preventing Hi-Pot and low-voltage failures, thereby enhancing battery performance and safety.

Implementation Method 1

allowing the passage of electrolyte and ions through its pores

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

an eluate eluted from the porous polymer substrate through a temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF) method

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature rising elution fractionation: Fractionation

Data Source

PatentUS20250337120A1Separator for electrochemical device and electrochemical device including the same
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
  • US20250337120A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A separator and an electrochemical device including the separator are provided. The separator comprises a porous polymer substrate including a polymer resin, and the polymer resin having specific polymer polydispersity index, weight-average molecular weight, content of a fraction eluted at a specific temperature, and indentation depth, thereby having improved compression resistance and insulation breakdown voltage.