Biodegradable Polymer Implants for Spinal Cord Injury Pressure Relief

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current spinal cord injury treatments, particularly surgical decompression, are ineffective in addressing secondary injuries and intrinsic pressure issues, leading to incomplete recovery and functional deficits due to the lack of technologies that can control intra-parenchymal pressure and promote nerve regeneration.

Innovation Solution

Biocompatible polymeric mini-tubes and bandages are used to create a new interface within the compressed spinal cord, alleviating pressure and promoting healing by diffusing compression forces and providing a structure to mitigate inflammation, while also being capable of conducting electrical signals to support neural regeneration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If surgical decompression is performed to relieve pressure from surrounding bone, then extrinsic pressure is reduced, but intrinsic intra-parenchymal pressure and secondary injuries are not addressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextrinsic pressureVSAvoideffectiveness of treatment
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A biocompatible polymer implant is introduced as an intermediary substance between the compressed spinal cord and surrounding tissues. This implant acts as a mediator that physically displaces compressive forces and provides a protective interface, allowing the spinal cord to be relieved from both extrinsic and intrinsic pressure without requiring complex surgical intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the physical state and composition of the treatment interface by introducing a biodegradable polymer material that can be molded to fit the injury site. This material undergoes controlled degradation over time, transitioning from a structural support role to complete resorption, thereby dynamically adapting to the healing process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Speed

If early surgical decompression is performed to reduce secondary injury, then pressure relief is achieved, but the timing window for effectiveness is difficult to determine

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetiming of interventionVSAvoiddetermination of effective time window
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The biocompatible polymer implant is applied immediately at the time of injury to prevent secondary damage before it can fully develop. This preliminary action eliminates the need to determine precise timing windows, as the protective effect is established from the moment of application and continues through the critical early injury phase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The polymer implant serves as a pre-positioned cushioning agent that absorbs and dissipates compressive forces before they can cause additional damage to the spinal cord. This beforehand protection is in place during the entire critical period of secondary injury development, regardless of when the injury occurred

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Stress or pressure

If decompression surgery removes bone and soft tissue structures, then surrounding pressure is reduced, but underlying intrinsic pressure at the injury site remains unaddressed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurrounding pressureVSAvoidintrinsic pressure
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The polymer implant is positioned directly at the injury site to serve as an intermediary that addresses intrinsic pressure from within. Unlike external decompression that only removes surrounding structures, this implant works from the inside to displace compressive forces and protect the spinal cord parenchyma

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The treatment applies local quality by placing the polymer implant specifically at the injury site rather than performing widespread decompression. The implant is molded to fit the exact dimensions and shape of the lesion, providing targeted pressure relief precisely where it is needed without affecting surrounding healthy tissues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of manufacture

If no technology is used to control intra-parenchymal pressure, then surgical decompression can be performed, but the procedure becomes ineffective in preventing secondary tissue destruction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical procedureVSAvoidprevention of secondary injury
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the physical parameters of the injury environment by introducing a material with specific mechanical properties - a biocompatible polymer that is both structurally supportive and gradually degradable. This material parameter change enables effective control of intra-parenchymal pressure through a relatively simple implantation procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The biodegradable polymer implant functions as a temporary protective structure that serves its purpose during the critical early injury phase and then naturally degrades and is absorbed by the body. This disposable approach eliminates the need for secondary removal surgery and provides effective secondary injury prevention during the period when it is most needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The use of biocompatible polymeric mini-tubes and bandages effectively reduces secondary injuries, promotes nerve regeneration, and enhances functional recovery by alleviating pressure and inflammation, leading to improved locomotor function and tissue protection.

Implementation Method 1

alleviating pressure and promoting healing by diffusing compression forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffusion: Diffusion

Implementation Method 2

capable of conducting electrical signals to support neural regeneration

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentEP2010232B1Methods and compositions for the treatment of open and closed wound spinal cord injuries
Publication Date: 2017.10.11 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENT CORP
  • EP2010232B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP2010232B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2010232B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

Devices and methods for the treatment of open and closed wound spinal cord injuries are disclosed. For example, described herein are devices and methods for mitigating secondary injury to, and promoting recovery of, spinal cord primary injuries. More particularly, certain embodiments of the present invention are directed to polymeric mini-tubes that may be used for the treatment of spinal cord injuries. In addition, other embodiments are directed to polymeric "fill-in" bandages that may be used for the treatment of spinal cord injuries. For example, an erodible, or biodegradable, form of biocompatible polymer of the present invention is fabricated for surgical implantation into the site of the spinal cord injury.